AFDD protection to comms cabinet in HRRB

Is AFDD protection required to BS EN 60309 socket circuit serving landlords CNS comms cabinet in HRRB? The building is multi residential with commercial amenities. If so does BS 7671 permit similar approach for RCD to omit on grounds of nuisance tripping? 

Parents
  • I don't see an obvious get-out clause for 421.1.7 like there is for 411.3.3. Maybe IT equipment (being generally free of a.c. motors and frequently operated switching devices) isn't particularly prone to nuisance trip AFDDs,but I share your concern.

    I guess another option would be to hard-wire the rack (e.g. replace the socket with a rotary isolator), make it a 3-phase socket (421.1.7 only applies to single phase) - it's fine just to pick up one phase at the plug if that all that's needed, or perhaps replace the fixed socket with a box, a short length of dangling flex and a BS EN 60309 connector ... by BS 7671 definitions that would seem to be classed as connector rather than a socket outlet (but I can see a debate about that).

       - Andy.

Reply
  • I don't see an obvious get-out clause for 421.1.7 like there is for 411.3.3. Maybe IT equipment (being generally free of a.c. motors and frequently operated switching devices) isn't particularly prone to nuisance trip AFDDs,but I share your concern.

    I guess another option would be to hard-wire the rack (e.g. replace the socket with a rotary isolator), make it a 3-phase socket (421.1.7 only applies to single phase) - it's fine just to pick up one phase at the plug if that all that's needed, or perhaps replace the fixed socket with a box, a short length of dangling flex and a BS EN 60309 connector ... by BS 7671 definitions that would seem to be classed as connector rather than a socket outlet (but I can see a debate about that).

       - Andy.

Children
No Data