The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

Code-2 for non-fire-rated downlights installed in a 2nd floor flat kitchen ceiling with unoccupied/uninhabitable loft above

Hello everyone,

I've recently had a EICR for my flat and I was told that the downlights in the kitchen would be a Code-2 because they are not fire rated. I can see how this would be the case if there was a flat above me but there is only the loft space that is accessible via a telescopic ladder and hatch. The flat is on the 2nd floor. Are fire rated downlights required in this instance?

Secondly, why is the following guidance so vague?

EICRs - Coding, and the link to the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 webinar
"Fire-rated luminaires are required where the ceiling, in which they have been installed, is deemed to be a fire barrier. C2 would seem reasonable given that non-fire-rated luminaires have been recessed into a ceiling deemed to be a fire barrier."

One would have to be an expert in the Building Regulations and Approved Documents to be able to make this assessment. If the guidance can't be more prescriptive then I don't think it's worth giving.

Many thanks, Tim

Parents Reply
  • What is the expectation of a person carrying out an EICR? It seems a bit onerous to me to expect a competent electrical inspector to make a detailed inspection of the integrity of the fire barriers and interpret the building regulations accordingly - without the relevant specific guidance. It would seem to me that a Code-3 with a recommendation to consult with a buildings inspector would be a better approach maybe.

Children
  • It would seem to me that a Code-3 with a recommendation to consult with a buildings inspector would be a better approach maybe.

    That is an interesting concept.

    I am not sure that the codes work that way, but it does make good engineering sense. The problem is that if the buildings inspector decided that the lamp fittings were potentially dangerous, he (or she) cannot upgrade the C3.

    That said, I see no harm in making the recommendation in Section K (Observations) of the EICR.

  • recommendation to consult with a buildings inspector

    If further information is required, would an FI be appropriate?

       - Andy.

  • If further information is required, would an FI be appropriate?

    From the immediately previous posts to yours, Andy, this perhaps sounds more like a Limitation of the inspection, rather than an FI ?