The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

Struggling with insulated consumer units and information on power dissipation

I am quoting for a new consumer unit to go in to  a domestic garage. Supplies 3 circuits in the garage and a couple of circuits to other outbuildings.

Especially with the recent guidance on metallic consumer units outside I have been leaning towards using a plastic consumer unit, then comes the challenge.

I don't think anyone still builds populated consumer units for more than 4 ways. So then I look at building my own and power dissipation, very little information available from what I can see, the only company providing data is MCG at 1a very low 11W.

The best I can find is that some enclosures state then are ok for say 63A, no idea what the assumed heat dissipation is. Also heat a dead end when looking for heat dissipation from RCBO's, I remember in the past seeing 12 to 15w at full load. So I seam to be left with a choice of putting a metal board in and hope it doesn't suffer from condensation, or puta plastic one in and hope it doesn't over heat. I could also put a metal board in a plastic enclosure, a bit less risk with heat.

I could probably just use any plastic din rail enclosure and not have an issues, but frustrating this is so difficult.

Thoughts?

  • Dear Andy,
    Thank you for your previous response and for highlighting your perspective on BS 7671 and the considerations for consumer units in garages.
    While I acknowledge some of the points you made, I must emphasize that the electrical interconnection between the garage and the main house brings the garage under the same regulatory requirements as the domestic premises.
    Key Points:
    1. Regulation 421.1.201: This regulation states that consumer units and similar switchgear assemblies shall comply with BS EN 61439-3 and shall be made from non-combustible material. The primary intent is to mitigate fire risks in domestic installations. The regulation applies to all parts of the domestic electrical system, including garages that are electrically interconnected with the main house.
    2. Electrical Interconnection: Since the garage is supplied by the main consumer unit in the house, it is considered part of the same electrical system. Therefore, the requirement for non-combustible consumer units extends to the garage to maintain consistent safety standards across the entire domestic installation.
    3. Environmental Protection: While there are concerns about condensation affecting delicate components such as RCBOs, these risks can be effectively mitigated. Using fire foam seals, condensation seals, or weatherproof enclosures can protect the metallic consumer unit from dampness, ensuring both fire safety and durability.
    I want to make it clear that the intent of Regulation 421.1.201 is to ensure fire safety across all parts of the domestic electrical system, including interconnected garages. Therefore, using a metallic consumer unit in the garage is necessary to comply with the 18th Edition of the IET Wiring Regulations (BS 7671) and to maintain consistent safety standards.
    I hope this clarifies the situation and reinforces the importance of adhering to the regulations. I am open to further discussion on this matter if needed.
    Best regards,
    Gary
    Qualified JIB Technician
  • Hi Gary. I’ve always considered remote or detached garages exempt from regulation 421.1.201

    -Andy

  • It is unfortunate that BS 7671 defines neither "domestic" nor "household". However, I suggest that it is distinct from commercial or industrial. I have no doubt that my detached garage is on my premises. If it were not, on whose premises would it lie?

    OED: premises = "A house or building together with its grounds, outhouses, etc."

  • I'm not sure that applying additional seals to pre manufactured enclosure is a practical way forward - any modifications that aren't approved by the manufacturer would undermine the BS EN 61439 approval provided by the original manufacturer - leaving the installer with the onerous task of having to demonstrate compliance with all the requirements of the equipment standard. Even on a more practical level, as but one example, the front flap would likely need some means of latching to provide compression on any seal - so you'd have to make sure that any fixings you used for the new catch didn't affect the creepage and clearance distances within the enclosure (which would be difficult to achieve without manufacturer specific information that's not generally available), and also didn't damage any original corrosion protection (e.g. galvanising).  I suppose you could enclose the whole CU in an another airtight enclosure, but even that approach isn't without problems - one that was closely fitting would restrict heat dissipation (one of the OP's original concerns), but making it larger would mean that a much larger volume of moisture holding air would be trapped, itself increasing the condensation risk.

    BTW I couldn't help noticing some of your responses seem to show the hallmarks of being AI generated - which AI engine are you using?

       - Andy.

  • I must emphasize that the electrical interconnection between the garage and the main house brings the garage under the same regulatory requirements as the domestic premises.

    That's a very interesting claim - how do you come to that conclusion? Where in BS 7671 is that statement made? I'm curious as that principle, if true, would seem to have wide ranging implications as practically all premises in the UK are electrically interconnected via the National Grid.

       - Andy.

  • Hi Andy,

    Thanks for your detailed response. I understand your concerns about the practical implications of modifying pre-manufactured enclosures. Indeed, any modifications that aren't approved by the manufacturer could undermine the BS EN 61439 approval and create compliance issues. Your points about the potential difficulties with creepage and clearance distances, corrosion protection, and heat dissipation are well noted.
    My original intention was to emphasize the importance of ensuring that all parts of an electrical installation, including interconnected outbuildings like garages, adhere to the same safety standards as the main premises. This interpretation is based on the broader understanding of "premises" as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, which includes a house or building together with its grounds and outbuildings.
    Regarding the electrical interconnection, while the house is indeed connected to the DNO (Distribution Network Operator), the focus here is on the local premises' electrical safety. A detached garage, when electrically connected to the main house and within the same property boundary, is considered part of the same premises according to the broader definition.
    For instance, another engineer, Chris Pearson, pointed out that BS 7671 does not explicitly define "domestic" or "household," but these terms are generally understood to be distinct from commercial or industrial settings. According to Chris, a detached garage is undoubtedly part of the premises, as it lies within the property boundaries.
    I also want to highlight that Schneider Electric's distribution boards (DBs) and consumer units (CUs) are manufactured to high specifications, including galvanization and protection against damp conditions. They are designed to comply with BS EN 61439 and other relevant standards, ensuring their reliability and safety even in challenging environments.
    Regarding the AI remark, I'd like to clarify that my responses are informed by extensive research and industry knowledge to ensure accuracy and relevance. If there's any specific section of BS 7671 that you believe contradicts this interpretation, I'm open to exploring it further. Our main objective should always be to ensure safety and compliance.
    Also, I'd like to remind everyone that this is a discussion, not a ping pong fight. Maintaining respect and avoiding rudeness would be greatly appreciated. Let's work together to ensure a productive and respectful conversation.
    Thanks for your insights, and I look forward to continuing this discussion productively.

    Best regards,

    Gary Robert Jone JIB registered Electrician, Grade Technician

  • It clearly doesn't.
    The detached outbuilding may equally for example be for plant (swimming pool pump, battery banks, gensets  etc) or a greenhouse, and they all have rules of their own that are significantly at odds with the rules for somewhere people sleep. And then supplies to caravans - where folk do sleep - are different again depending if they move or are static. TT earths for example.
    Where it gets its supply from may affect the assumptions about voltage drop - which also may go negative for things that can generate, but the rules that apply to the two places are not identical - though they share a huge amount of common basis of course. That's why we have different extra chapters in BS7671 for various special situations and locations to highlight the differences.
    Mike.

  • Hi Mike,

    Thanks for your input. I understand your points about the specific rules for different types of outbuildings and structures, such as those for plant equipment, greenhouses, and caravans. While BS 7671 indeed contains chapters for various special situations and locations, our current discussion is centered around domestic garages within the same boundary as the main house.

    The primary concern here is ensuring that all parts of an electrical installation within the same property adhere to the same safety standards. When a garage is electrically interconnected with the main house and within the same property boundary, it is essential to treat it with the same level of safety and compliance as the main domestic premises.

    If there are specific sections in BS 7671 that you believe provide clear distinctions or additional guidance on this matter, I'd appreciate it if you could point them out. Our goal should be to ensure the highest standards of safety and compliance across all installations.

    Let's continue this discussion with the aim of sharing knowledge and improving our understanding of electrical safety regulations.

    Best regards, Gary Robert Jones

    JIB registered Electrician, Grade Technician

  • Hi Gary. Q1.104 from WRAG. Can an insulated consumer unit or similar switchgear assembly complying with BS EN 61439-3 be installed in a detached outbuilding of a domestic (household) premises?

    Yes, subject to such construction being suitable for ambient environmental conditions such as:

    • likelihood of mechanical damage, 
    • use of outbuilding for storage of flammable materials such as paint and thinners, or 
    • presence of a corrosive atmosphere, such as that found in a swimming pool pump room.

    Consideration should also be given to the relative proximity of the outbuilding to the dwelling with respect to the possibility of fire-spread from one structure to the other.

  • The primary concern here is ensuring that all parts of an electrical installation within the same property adhere to the same safety standards.

    That's patently false - the electrical safety standards for a bathroom are significantly different to those for a bedroom within the same home for example (there's an entire section of differences in BS 7671 - Section 701). If two rooms within the same house have different standards, how does it follow that different rooms in different buildings serving differing purposes and containing differing environments must follow identical ones?

    a detached garage is undoubtedly part of the premises

    But not necessarily part of "domestic (household) premises" - when taken together with guidance issued by the IET and others at the time this regulation was introduced, it seems clear that detached outbuildings that are not normally lived in by members of the household were not intended to be covered by this regulation.

       - Andy.