Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 21 replies
  • Subscribers 43 subscribers
  • Views 10026 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

AFDD Q and A

lyledunn

I thought this was an interesting consideration from NICEIC Q and A on AFDDs. I would have thought the regulation was focused at what might end up connected to a socket rather than the AFDD protection for the circuit. Were that to be the case, then what about all the other circuits that do not have sockets?

Parents
  • 0

    It seems reasonable to me.

    I have always envisioned that AFDDs protect the occupier from arcing within the fixed wiring, which might have nothing attached. 

Reply
  • 0

    It seems reasonable to me.

    I have always envisioned that AFDDs protect the occupier from arcing within the fixed wiring, which might have nothing attached. 

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines