Should Electrical Tutors at FE colleges in the UK be mandated to complete a minimum of 1 week per year working in industry?

Should Electrical Tutors at FE colleges in the UK be mandated to complete a minimum of 1 week per year working in industry?


Points to consider
The work placement could be in Domestic/Commercial/Industrial and could also include specialisms like ATEX (ATmosphères EXplosibles)

The placement could be seen as a type of Enhanced CPD (Continuing Professional Development) so to speak

Experiences onsite could filter back into the educational space with regards to new techniques and modern day materials being used,  EG use of RCBO type B or SPD type 2 in CU/DB(Consumer Unit/Distribution Board) or GRP containment.

Broadening the horizons of the FE tutor could also lead to more rounded educational experience for the learners, this could include activities like commenting on feedback on the public draft of BS 7671

This tutor placement/work exchange could also help form a better relationship between the local FE college and future employers when the learners progress to requiring evidence for NVQ modules.



As always please be polite and respectful in this purely academic debate.





Come on everybody let’s help inspire the future.

Parents
  • That was an absolutely superb post by MapJ. After almost 35 years as a part-time tutor, it expertly summed up my views on that disconnect between the classroom and the coal face.

    With respect to the original question, there was a scheme for FE colleges in NI called “Lecturers into industry”. It was funded by the department of education. On the face of it, it seemed an excellent idea. Lecturers could seek a paid or unpaid position in local industry and apply for leave. Full salary continued to be paid, irrespective of income from whatever position was taken up.

    As a part-timer, I often covered for those who took advantage of the opportunity. Many full-time lecturers saw it as an escape rather than an opportunity to broaden their horizons and strengthen their front of class delivery.

    When I was a young man out on cold sites in the middle of winter, I thought it would be fantastic to be a lecturer in a warm, clean, classroom in an FE college, not to mention the long holidays and the opportunity to wear a shirt and tie.

    When the opportunity arose to enter that world, I did so with alacrity. All was good for several years and I put my heart and soul into every class I took, sometimes at the expense of my own business (I still do, by the way).

    I cant pinpoint a definite time, but I started to notice that the full-time guys had lost all their mojo. They seemed demoralised and unwilling to do anything that was in any way construed to be beyond their contract.

    Perhaps it was pay, it could certainly have been the ponderous weight of multi-layers of ineffectual managerial oversight, or it could have been the cut-backs that left practical classes with half a length of steel conduit per candidate per year. Or it could have been the iniquitous system of output related funding where lecturers were expected, by whatever means, to force totally unsuitable candidates through assessments so that claims for funding could be made. Then again, it could have been the lack of robust disciplinary procedures where management utterly failed to provide support for the lecturers dealing with difficult lads. Of course, it could also have been that disconnect that Mike alluded to. Lads who had left school to take up a trade as an installation electrician because of an anathema for all things academic only to find themselves trying to get to grips with the induced emf of a 4-pole lap wound DC generator.

    Likely it was a combination of things. In any event, several excellent lecturers took advantage of the scheme. One even secured funding to leave and concentrate on his own business. He, like many others, never came back!

    Ask any Electrical Installation Department in any FE college here and they will tell you about the difficulties of recruiting and retaining good lecturers. When you have a 4th year apprentice getting 1500 Euros a week for erecting miles of galvanized tray in a data centre in Dublin, it wont be the pay that will attract a good tradesman to pack up for the world described above. Similarly, it might be a gamble to release existing lecturers into industry.....they might never come back!

  • Ask any Electrical Installation Department in any FE college here and they will tell you about the difficulties of recruiting and retaining good lecturers

    Agreed

  • Similarly, it might be a gamble to release existing lecturers into industry.....they might never come back!

    Valid point but if the industry does nothing the natural attrition will occur anyway.  FE colleges need to pay higher salary to the Electrical tutors and give them a better package than what is currently offered in the UK as a whole which must include the backend managerial support.

  • cut-backs that left practical classes with half a length of steel conduit per candidate per year

    We had more than that, but only by virtue of the fact that it was the last Friday of the course, and for most (including the part-time tutors) POETS applied. Two of us stayed along with the full-time tutor.

    I greatly admire those practitioners who can put in the bends in the right places and have no wastage. It is an art! :-)

Reply
  • cut-backs that left practical classes with half a length of steel conduit per candidate per year

    We had more than that, but only by virtue of the fact that it was the last Friday of the course, and for most (including the part-time tutors) POETS applied. Two of us stayed along with the full-time tutor.

    I greatly admire those practitioners who can put in the bends in the right places and have no wastage. It is an art! :-)

Children
No Data