TN system - Max Zs Vs tripping time in the Presence of RCD protection

Hi, 
I am trying to confirm a point. 

as long as we meet the max disconnection time (let say 0.4s for a TN system) . for a small power circuit, 
Can we ignore the Max Zs requirement ? 

Example 
Small power  radial circuit ,20A RCBO 30mA , type A C curve, 
RCD trip time is 20ms 

but, max Zs is higher than it should be to Overload trip before 0.4s (lets say Max allowed  Zs is 1.09 but the measured is 1.40)

Can we override the 0.4s overload tripping requirement as its already being met with RCD protection of the RCBO ? i.e. as it trips at 20ms anyway so it meets the 0.4s requirement. 

Or is this a subjective matter? 

Thank you all in advance. 

Parents
  • related to what used to be called the "alternative method" which permitted disconnection times for final circuits that would otherwise require disconnection in 0.4s to be extended to a time not exceeding 5s.

    Arguably that option is still there - tucked away under 419.3 - all the "alternative method" did, in today's language, was ensure that the c.p.c. itself met the requirement for a supplementary bonding conductor.

       - Andy. 

Reply
  • related to what used to be called the "alternative method" which permitted disconnection times for final circuits that would otherwise require disconnection in 0.4s to be extended to a time not exceeding 5s.

    Arguably that option is still there - tucked away under 419.3 - all the "alternative method" did, in today's language, was ensure that the c.p.c. itself met the requirement for a supplementary bonding conductor.

       - Andy. 

Children
No Data