Inverters for energy savings

Hi,

Thanks for the detailed response.

Last time I presented figures like this, I was laughed at for using pi, when calculating the area of a circle, it was in a report, so all the figures were removed - this part is a bit of a different story, I just take personal satisfaction out of these side projects.

We do have a series of separately controlled equipment. The duty is shared because of how the pipework is configured, they are effectively a battery. There are quite a few variables, tonnes of material, surface area of material, temperature of material, ambient temperature, ambient humidity, start temperature of coolant. What I do is compare similar tonnage, material temperature and ambient temperature vs energy consumed. I have also just monitored total energy usage over several weeks vs the same weeks in the previous year, it always comes back at about 80% saving. I even went and put my clamp meter on the kit for a sanity check and that too confirms the difference. 

Regarding the pumps, we dont have transducers on at the moment. They serve a process, so no long pipe runs, just several meters. I have got to grips with the reason the valve is closed to control the high current draw problem it had. The pumps basically squirt water out of a matrix of nozzles, so its always the same duty, nothing varies. I have established that 2/3 of the time, only a gentle operation is required so an inverter should easily be able to sort that via two user buttons. 

The squirting is more of a subjective thing, is it sufficient rather than operating at a certain pressure or flow rate. There is a point at which it affects product quality, so that would have to be a bit of trial and error.

I think what I would like to do is install inverters, open the throttled valve, modify the nozzles to improve the squirting performance, We did look at (I forget the proper name) venturi nozzles that entrain the fluid around the submerged nozzle, amplifying the effect. Ideally, I'd like to sort the pipework but I don't have the time or budget for that, so its making the most of what we have.

Hi,

Thanks for the detailed response.

Last time I presented figures like this, I was laughed at for using pi, when calculating the area of a circle, it was in a report, so all the figures were removed - this part is a bit of a different story, I just take personal satisfaction out of these side projects.

We do have a series of separately controlled equipment. The duty is shared because of how the pipework is configured, they are effectively a battery. There are quite a few variables, tonnes of material, surface area of material, temperature of material, ambient temperature, ambient humidity, start temperature of coolant. What I do is compare similar tonnage, material temperature and ambient temperature vs energy consumed. I have also just monitored total energy usage over several weeks vs the same weeks in the previous year, it always comes back at about 80% saving. I even went and put my clamp meter on the kit for a sanity check and that too confirms the difference. 

Regarding the pumps, we dont have transducers on at the moment. They serve a process, so no long pipe runs, just several meters. I have got to grips with the reason the valve is closed to control the high current draw problem it had. The pumps basically squirt water out of a matrix of nozzles, so its always the same duty, nothing varies. I have established that 2/3 of the time, only a gentle operation is required so an inverter should easily be able to sort that via two user buttons. 

The squirting is more of a subjective thing, is it sufficient rather than operating at a certain pressure or flow rate. There is a point at which it affects product quality, so that would have to be a bit of trial and error.

I think what I would like to do is install inverters, open the throttled valve, modify the nozzles to improve the squirting performance, We did look at (I forget the proper name) venturi nozzles that entrain the fluid around the submerged nozzle, amplifying the effect. Ideally, I'd like to sort the pipework but I don't have the time or budget for that, so its making the most of what we have.

I can believe an 80% saving - having what is in effect a big fan on all the time rather than only when needed is remarkably wasteful as it has to be sized for the hottest summer day and greatest heat load, two states that seldom coincide.

On a much smaller scale we do the same with the electronics and have speed controlled fans. Not only does it save energy, the fan bearings last longer and filters block more slowly, so the maintenance interval is greater.... and yes we find on cold days the fans are off, so a 100% power saving  on those days !

To your pumps, if the throttle valve is re-opened but the pump slowed by inverter drive instead, you should be able to reach the same nozzle flow point, but without wasting energy in turbulent flow at the restriction, so the fluid, pump and pipe will all be ever so slightly cooler. 

Ideally you'd have something measuring the speed of the fluid in the pipes and closed loop feedback but the current throttle valve is open loop, and seems to work, so maybe the inverter can be the same if its not that critical and just needs to be 'enough'.

Again, from the point of view of service life having a slightly oversized machine loafing along running cool, rather than a small one struggling near to failure, is preferred, but only within reason of course - a factor of 2 perhaps..

Mike.