How might the proposed changes to UK mains voltage limits affect older electrical infrastructure?

Hi all,
I’m looking for some expert insight into how proposed changes to UK mains voltage limits, particularly any shift away from the nominal 230 to 240 volt range, might affect older electrical infrastructure.
Our site is fed directly from a DNO transformer, although only two of its output connections are currently in use and we’re unsure how many it has in total. The infrastructure was originally designed and installed in the 1980s and includes legacy three-phase motors and analogue control systems that were built to operate on 240 volts single-phase and 440 volts three-phase.
We also have a step-down transformer that is fed by a three-phase 125 amp supply and provides 110 volts at 50 hertz. This is used to meet extra-low voltage requirements in our training environment. In addition, there is a separate system currently locked out that runs on 115 volts at 60 hertz, which is temporarily offline due to a failed frequency converter. This is scheduled for replacement shortly.
I’m particularly interested in understanding how any changes to mains voltage might affect the transformers themselves, both the DNO-fed unit and our internal step-down transformers. I would also appreciate any thoughts on the risks to analogue control systems calibrated for 240 and 440 volts, potential safety or compliance concerns from undervoltage or harmonics introduced by modern supply variations, and any practical mitigation strategies or retrofit options for mixed-voltage and mixed-frequency setups.
Any advice, experiences, or references to standards would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Parents
  • Interesting - I hadn't heard of the recent proposed changes before.

    From what I can gather the proposal is to move from 230V +10% / -6% to 230V +10% / -10% ... i.e. what my 16th Ed brown book says was originally proposed for 1st January 2008! (but then later dropped).

    I think the idea then was to bring us fully into line with ex-220V lands - as their change to the tolerance bands was initially the opposite way around to us (something like 230V +6% / -10%) - so we'd eventually meet up at +/- 10% for all. I believe it was the filament lamps the scuppered that plan though - the simple tungsten technology couldn't cope with such a wide voltage range - resulting in either obviously dim lamps or unacceptable reduction in service life, so even after 230V harmonization lamp manufacturers still produced separate 220V and 240V versions.

    These days though, the filament lamp is just about extinct, so problems should be fewer...

       - Andy.

  • Interesting - I hadn't heard of the recent proposed changes before.

    It seems to be very recent - see eFIXX article here. It is not clear whether a consultation has been opened, but since I cannot find one, it is probably still a proposal to consult.

    As the article says, the ESQCR would have to be amended first.

    obviously dim lamps or unacceptable reduction in service life

    Yes, 220 V lamps were noticeably brighter, but not for long.

    It appears that the intention is to drop the target mean voltage (taken over a period) in order to allow for excessive household generation. At one time the grid had to cope with peaks of demand, but now it is peaks of supply.

  • My rough understanding was that this adjustment to the lower voltage limit was an accommodation of potential effects of prosumer generation/consumption fluctuations at the point of customer supply.

    This was so that the DNOs didn't need to change anything on their side, and that if extra customer loading dragged voltages down a bit they wouldn't be forced to make adjustments (or they could make changes if generation was pushing old setting too high).

    Meanwhile I saw a YT video about New Zealand also adjusting their high side limit to give headroom on long lines for cases where customer generation made their supply voltage higher than current limits. The newly announced NZ Grid Voltage Increase explained 

Reply
  • My rough understanding was that this adjustment to the lower voltage limit was an accommodation of potential effects of prosumer generation/consumption fluctuations at the point of customer supply.

    This was so that the DNOs didn't need to change anything on their side, and that if extra customer loading dragged voltages down a bit they wouldn't be forced to make adjustments (or they could make changes if generation was pushing old setting too high).

    Meanwhile I saw a YT video about New Zealand also adjusting their high side limit to give headroom on long lines for cases where customer generation made their supply voltage higher than current limits. The newly announced NZ Grid Voltage Increase explained 

Children