How might the proposed changes to UK mains voltage limits affect older electrical infrastructure?

Hi all,
I’m looking for some expert insight into how proposed changes to UK mains voltage limits, particularly any shift away from the nominal 230 to 240 volt range, might affect older electrical infrastructure.
Our site is fed directly from a DNO transformer, although only two of its output connections are currently in use and we’re unsure how many it has in total. The infrastructure was originally designed and installed in the 1980s and includes legacy three-phase motors and analogue control systems that were built to operate on 240 volts single-phase and 440 volts three-phase.
We also have a step-down transformer that is fed by a three-phase 125 amp supply and provides 110 volts at 50 hertz. This is used to meet extra-low voltage requirements in our training environment. In addition, there is a separate system currently locked out that runs on 115 volts at 60 hertz, which is temporarily offline due to a failed frequency converter. This is scheduled for replacement shortly.
I’m particularly interested in understanding how any changes to mains voltage might affect the transformers themselves, both the DNO-fed unit and our internal step-down transformers. I would also appreciate any thoughts on the risks to analogue control systems calibrated for 240 and 440 volts, potential safety or compliance concerns from undervoltage or harmonics introduced by modern supply variations, and any practical mitigation strategies or retrofit options for mixed-voltage and mixed-frequency setups.
Any advice, experiences, or references to standards would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Parents
  • As with lots of things the answer is it depends.  EG. 6amp rcbo trip time at 207v vs 230v vs 240v vs 253v 

    The primary effect of different voltages relates to the current that can flow for a given fault or load (Ohm's Law: \(I=V/R\)). A lower voltage (207V) will result in a slightly lower current than a higher voltage (240V) for the exact same circuit resistance: For any given current level above 6A, the trip time is determined by the fixed trip curve (eg Type B or Type C).The only practical difference is that a specific fault resistance might draw a slightly lower current at 207V compared to 240V, potentially moving the fault to a different point on the time-current curve and resulting in a marginally different—perhaps slightly longer—trip time

    The above being said a pump or a motor at the low end of the voltage spectrum might start to seem underpowered or run slower which could be an issue for some that have the pump set to a run time rather than a volume or sensor on and sensor off.

    Caveat time.

    240v in the UK became 230v nominal ages ago.  (about 1994) but in Yorkshire (other regions are available) 250v and above are quite regular.  The DNO/DSO/NG are probably in no rush to change the transformer tap to 207v but they reserve to use the right of 207v IF it is needed espcially for single phase.  This is probably being lead by the amount of re-newable energy be ProSumed/Generated

  • Its also worth noting that it would be a most odd situation where you saw the full variation from 253 off load to 207 on load, partly due to the heat losses in cables becoming more than 20% of that in  the load, and partly because you would have problems to arrange circuit protection safely. A consequence of  droop of 20% under  load is that the PSSC is only 5 times the full load current -  and given that most fuses will carry 100% overload i.e. 200% of nominal rating, for ages, and at a multiple of less than 5 times a B type breaker may not prompt trip and a C type is guaranteed by design, not to, then unusual measures (well earth fault relays and shunt trips) are needed. Also by the time you add on the permitted voltage drop in the final installation the socket in the garage at the end of the garden in the house at the end of the street main is looking very poorly ;-) 
    You would only really expect to see both extremes when at some time of day local generation reverses the slope of the voltage drop, and then at other times heavy loads take the full quota.
    I'd expect this concession to be used by the DNOs as a reason not to adjust things, rather than as a basis for re-setting transformers where no problems are reported, and perhaps allow slightly longer runs on new housing estates where in the past 2 transformers would have been used but were only just required.
    Mike.

  • trip time at 207v vs 230v

    Just to add to Mike's reply - in all this we're talking about voltages at two different parts of the system - the nominal supply voltages are as at the consumer's supply terminals (i.e. include the effect of voltage drop along the supply lines) whereas for loop impedance calculations the physics is really based on the voltage at the substation - the voltage drop along the supply lines during a fault is taken into account of by including Ze in the calculation. (A while back, ADS calculation took this into account, based on Uoc rather than Uo). It's very unlikely the substation would only be pumping out 207V as there would be no margin for v.d. in the supplier's lines.

       - Andy.

Reply
  • trip time at 207v vs 230v

    Just to add to Mike's reply - in all this we're talking about voltages at two different parts of the system - the nominal supply voltages are as at the consumer's supply terminals (i.e. include the effect of voltage drop along the supply lines) whereas for loop impedance calculations the physics is really based on the voltage at the substation - the voltage drop along the supply lines during a fault is taken into account of by including Ze in the calculation. (A while back, ADS calculation took this into account, based on Uoc rather than Uo). It's very unlikely the substation would only be pumping out 207V as there would be no margin for v.d. in the supplier's lines.

       - Andy.

Children
No Data