How might the proposed changes to UK mains voltage limits affect older electrical infrastructure?

Hi all,
I’m looking for some expert insight into how proposed changes to UK mains voltage limits, particularly any shift away from the nominal 230 to 240 volt range, might affect older electrical infrastructure.
Our site is fed directly from a DNO transformer, although only two of its output connections are currently in use and we’re unsure how many it has in total. The infrastructure was originally designed and installed in the 1980s and includes legacy three-phase motors and analogue control systems that were built to operate on 240 volts single-phase and 440 volts three-phase.
We also have a step-down transformer that is fed by a three-phase 125 amp supply and provides 110 volts at 50 hertz. This is used to meet extra-low voltage requirements in our training environment. In addition, there is a separate system currently locked out that runs on 115 volts at 60 hertz, which is temporarily offline due to a failed frequency converter. This is scheduled for replacement shortly.
I’m particularly interested in understanding how any changes to mains voltage might affect the transformers themselves, both the DNO-fed unit and our internal step-down transformers. I would also appreciate any thoughts on the risks to analogue control systems calibrated for 240 and 440 volts, potential safety or compliance concerns from undervoltage or harmonics introduced by modern supply variations, and any practical mitigation strategies or retrofit options for mixed-voltage and mixed-frequency setups.
Any advice, experiences, or references to standards would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Parents
  • There are a few known issues with reducing the lower limit in the voltage range ... perhaps top of my list are:

    1. Cmin will change from 0.95 to 0.90 for public electricity supplies, meaning there will be cases where earth fault loop impedances are too high for ADS to be provided by the existing overcurrent protective device. There might also be odd cases where the adiabatic criterion is no longer satisfied, i.e. the cables of the affected circuit are no longer protected against thermal effects. 

    2. Non-linear (specifically 'controlled' or 'switched-mode' converters and inverter drive) loads, which are becoming far more common-place, and will likely make a large chunk of future loads, will actually consume more current as the voltage drops, because they are effectively constant power loads. This might mean that the circuit has not necessarily been designed for the new possible load current, which might be more than 5 % higher than expected (for the 4 % drop).

    3. Some existing motors, particularly single-phase, might run hot.
Reply
  • There are a few known issues with reducing the lower limit in the voltage range ... perhaps top of my list are:

    1. Cmin will change from 0.95 to 0.90 for public electricity supplies, meaning there will be cases where earth fault loop impedances are too high for ADS to be provided by the existing overcurrent protective device. There might also be odd cases where the adiabatic criterion is no longer satisfied, i.e. the cables of the affected circuit are no longer protected against thermal effects. 

    2. Non-linear (specifically 'controlled' or 'switched-mode' converters and inverter drive) loads, which are becoming far more common-place, and will likely make a large chunk of future loads, will actually consume more current as the voltage drops, because they are effectively constant power loads. This might mean that the circuit has not necessarily been designed for the new possible load current, which might be more than 5 % higher than expected (for the 4 % drop).

    3. Some existing motors, particularly single-phase, might run hot.
Children
No Data