This is a very pertinent question, particularly for legacy 1980s installations.
Firstly, it is worth noting that the UK supply has been nominally 230 V since harmonisation, but in practice remains within the statutory tolerance defined in ESQCR and BS EN 50160 (typically 216–253 V). Therefore, most equipment originally designed for 240 V single-phase and 415/440 V three-phase has generally continued to operate without significant issues.
Regarding transformers, both the DNO distribution transformer and internal step-down units are usually designed to accommodate ±10% voltage variation. The main concern would be thermal loading under sustained overvoltage conditions rather than immediate functional failure. Tap settings on the LV side may also be relevant if site voltage is consistently high.
For legacy three-phase motors rated 440 V, operation on today’s nominal 400 V supply is typically acceptable, with only a modest reduction in torque margin. The more critical risks tend to arise from undervoltage effects on control circuits (relay chatter, contactor drop-out) rather than on the motors themselves.
Analogue control systems calibrated for fixed 240/440 V supplies may indeed be more sensitive to modern power quality issues, particularly harmonics introduced by VSDs, UPS systems and EV charging. A power quality survey (voltage profile, THD, flicker) would be a sensible first step.
In terms of mitigation, practical options include reviewing transformer tap positions, ensuring control transformers are correctly rated, and considering modernisation of critical analogue control components. Reference documents would include BS 7671, BS EN 50160 and IET Guidance Note 1/Power Quality.
Overall, the change in nominal voltage itself is unlikely to be the primary issue — supply variation and power quality in mixed legacy/modern environments are usually the key factors.
This is a very pertinent question, particularly for legacy 1980s installations.
Firstly, it is worth noting that the UK supply has been nominally 230 V since harmonisation, but in practice remains within the statutory tolerance defined in ESQCR and BS EN 50160 (typically 216–253 V). Therefore, most equipment originally designed for 240 V single-phase and 415/440 V three-phase has generally continued to operate without significant issues.
Regarding transformers, both the DNO distribution transformer and internal step-down units are usually designed to accommodate ±10% voltage variation. The main concern would be thermal loading under sustained overvoltage conditions rather than immediate functional failure. Tap settings on the LV side may also be relevant if site voltage is consistently high.
For legacy three-phase motors rated 440 V, operation on today’s nominal 400 V supply is typically acceptable, with only a modest reduction in torque margin. The more critical risks tend to arise from undervoltage effects on control circuits (relay chatter, contactor drop-out) rather than on the motors themselves.
Analogue control systems calibrated for fixed 240/440 V supplies may indeed be more sensitive to modern power quality issues, particularly harmonics introduced by VSDs, UPS systems and EV charging. A power quality survey (voltage profile, THD, flicker) would be a sensible first step.
In terms of mitigation, practical options include reviewing transformer tap positions, ensuring control transformers are correctly rated, and considering modernisation of critical analogue control components. Reference documents would include BS 7671, BS EN 50160 and IET Guidance Note 1/Power Quality.
Overall, the change in nominal voltage itself is unlikely to be the primary issue — supply variation and power quality in mixed legacy/modern environments are usually the key factors.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site