Insulation and thermal bridging and an EV charger

The situation is a garage being converted into a TV room

External wall with batten attached which is to be insulated with 75mm PIR insulation and plaster boarded
Stud is only 70mm!!

Picture attached...

The house CU is high up on the wall. the tails ran down the internal garage wall to the outside meter box
A second CU was mid way down the wall feeding  an external EV charger, the tails of which also went to the external meter box

The tails were in plastic conduit surface mounded.

Since the tails (no RCD protection)to both boards are to be hidden by the plasterboard, I though best to put in two lengths of earthed metal conduit (50x50)
The 10mm feed to the 7kW charger is clipped to the batten.

The owner is doing the batten and insulation.
I am concerned about insulation being near my cables and trunking


I presume the trunking it self will be a break in the insulation so could be a thermal bridge?

Could you run the insulation up to the trunking or should they be a gap.

cables clipped along the batten how far should they be from the insulation,
I would like to leave about a 50mm gap? but this will cause this thermal bridge issue I believe?

Also say if  a 2.5mm  socket radial (fused to 16A) was ran through the batten and against the concrete block 
with insulation over it. What installation method would you consider that. I presume these soft concrete blocks have some insulation factor.
Will they be much of a heat sink?

I am concerned about the EV cable really as a continuous load in this stud work. Its has a bit of extra capacity as 10mm2 for a 7kW charger.

How can the wall be adequately insulated, without bridging and the cables be safe?

Thanks

Parents
  • On the surface of what ? please

    Interior surface - i.e. on top of the plasterboard. That way they're not concealed so all the issues zones or concentric earth protection, not to mention being embedded in thermal insulation all go away (apart for the short distance through the wall to the meter box). If the customer is happy with two CUs surface mounted on that wall, a bit of extra trunking shouldn't be too hard a sell.

    The owner is thinking of not insulating the section with the tails, but that could be an issue?

    It's pretty rubbish from a thermal point of view - with risks of condensation both on the plasterboard surface and against the original wall (risking rot of the studs - the pictures seem to suggest untreated timer is being used too Rolling eyes)

       - Andy.

Reply
  • On the surface of what ? please

    Interior surface - i.e. on top of the plasterboard. That way they're not concealed so all the issues zones or concentric earth protection, not to mention being embedded in thermal insulation all go away (apart for the short distance through the wall to the meter box). If the customer is happy with two CUs surface mounted on that wall, a bit of extra trunking shouldn't be too hard a sell.

    The owner is thinking of not insulating the section with the tails, but that could be an issue?

    It's pretty rubbish from a thermal point of view - with risks of condensation both on the plasterboard surface and against the original wall (risking rot of the studs - the pictures seem to suggest untreated timer is being used too Rolling eyes)

       - Andy.

Children
No Data