This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Is it important to have a Washington Accord degree?

Following up on a couple of threads here, does anyone here have experience on whether NOT having a Washington Accord degree (e.g. an IET accredited degree) makes it harder to get jobs in any particular countries?


Or, to put it the other way around, whether having one does actually make it easier in particular countries?


It's a question that frequently comes up here, and I don't ever remember seeing an answer.


Personally I don't remember ever hearing engineers saying they had a problem with mobility to any country, whatever their qualifications, (even to Canada, provided their process is followed), but I'd hesitate to say I have enough experience to say that this really isn't something to be concerned about.


Thanks,


Andy
Parents
  • I can only offer my opinion and anecdotal experience, which may not be representative.


    I've worked on the continent (Switzerland, Germany and Austria) for a while now and having a degree is more or less essential for professional engineering roles, in a couple of interviews I have been asked what exactly the course covered and how it compared to their local qualifications. 


    However, I would doubt people outside the circles of the professional engineering institutions know what the Washington Accord is, so I would say it's not important. At least not to employers.


    It would be enlightening to see some feedback from employers about these sort of questions. I wonder if the IET and other PEIs go in for this sort of thing.


    Different point. Roy:

     
    Roy Bowdler:
    The common factor being that more selective and demanding degrees in terms of Mathematics & Science are seen as “more suitable” preparation for Engineers, with any emphasis on “applications” considered more appropriate for an “associate engineer” or “Technologist”.

     


    In my opinion this is a filter to select people perceived to the best the academic system has to offer, rather than because these specific advanced maths and science skills are required for most engineers. 


Reply
  • I can only offer my opinion and anecdotal experience, which may not be representative.


    I've worked on the continent (Switzerland, Germany and Austria) for a while now and having a degree is more or less essential for professional engineering roles, in a couple of interviews I have been asked what exactly the course covered and how it compared to their local qualifications. 


    However, I would doubt people outside the circles of the professional engineering institutions know what the Washington Accord is, so I would say it's not important. At least not to employers.


    It would be enlightening to see some feedback from employers about these sort of questions. I wonder if the IET and other PEIs go in for this sort of thing.


    Different point. Roy:

     
    Roy Bowdler:
    The common factor being that more selective and demanding degrees in terms of Mathematics & Science are seen as “more suitable” preparation for Engineers, with any emphasis on “applications” considered more appropriate for an “associate engineer” or “Technologist”.

     


    In my opinion this is a filter to select people perceived to the best the academic system has to offer, rather than because these specific advanced maths and science skills are required for most engineers. 


Children
No Data