This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EN 60204 and protective conductors

I've asked this question elsewhere with no luck!

In EN 60204-1:2009 it says regarding the sizing of protective conductors (8.2.2): "This requirement is met in most cases where the relationship between the cross-sectional area of the phase conductors associated with that part of the equipment and the cross sectional area of the associated protective conductor is in accordance with Table 1" The phrase "associated with that part of the equipment" I take to mean that if, for example, I have a 24V PSU inside my cabinet fed by 1.5mm conductors and appropriately fused, the protective conductor to the PSU can also be 1.5mm, even if the incoming conductors are much bigger.


In EN 60204-1:2018 we are again referred to table 1, but the "associated" statement has gone. Table 1 deals with the sizing of the external protective conductor. Does this mean that all protective conductors inside the enclosure should be sized relative to the incoming phase conductors? To start with they would be too large for the earth terminal on my PSU!  Clearly there is a reason why this wording has changed, but what is the difference in application?
Parents

  • Alasdair Anderson:

    This is not a standard that I am intimately familiar with, but doesn't the paragraph in 5.2 immediately before Table one make it clear that it is "in relation to the size of the associated line conductors"?

    Alasdair




    Yes it does Alasdair, but 5.2 is "Terminal for connection of the external protective conductor". The whole paragraph relates to the incoming supply. Now 8.2.2. is to do with the internal protective conductors, so we may perhaps assume that since we are now clearly using Table 1 for a different purpose than the paragraph it appears in, the related line conductors are different as well.  I'm just concerned that I have to make this assumption when the previous version of the standard stated it clearly.


    John.

Reply

  • Alasdair Anderson:

    This is not a standard that I am intimately familiar with, but doesn't the paragraph in 5.2 immediately before Table one make it clear that it is "in relation to the size of the associated line conductors"?

    Alasdair




    Yes it does Alasdair, but 5.2 is "Terminal for connection of the external protective conductor". The whole paragraph relates to the incoming supply. Now 8.2.2. is to do with the internal protective conductors, so we may perhaps assume that since we are now clearly using Table 1 for a different purpose than the paragraph it appears in, the related line conductors are different as well.  I'm just concerned that I have to make this assumption when the previous version of the standard stated it clearly.


    John.

Children
No Data