Jon you’ve posted the link to YouTube as the post title which won’t behave as a hyperlink for people to click on. If you edit your post and change the title to something more explanatory and then add your link within the body text of your original post it would be more helpful ️

Blimey. You Tube banned the video 90 minutes before show time. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/01/06/1pm-est-climate-goals-vs-human-well-being-a-live-discussion-with-dr-judith-curry/

What a marvelous world we live in.

The video can be viewed here should you wish to do so.

rumble.com/v2470w4-climate-goals-vs.-human-well-being-a-live-discussion-with-dr.-judith-curry.html

Sensible action for climate misinformation- maybe the IET should consider a similar policy to remove misinformation posts in EngX

I don't believe that the censorship you're proposing is in any way democratic. The IET is a platform for 'free speech'

and has been for as long as I can remember.

We all have to filter out misinformation on a daily basis. How can the IET possible filter out opinion fairly?

Jon Steward said:

The IET is a platform for 'free speech'

and has been for as long as I can remember

It is?  The IET is a professional institution governed by a royal charter and a set of by-laws.  "Free speech" doesn't appear anywhere in those.

Absolutely.  Professional Engineers are also bound by codes of conduct which preclude spreading deliberate misinformation such as climate denial.
I would suggest the best thing is for engineers work together on trying to find solutions rather than denying the existence of the problem.

Absolutely.  Professional Engineers are also bound by codes of conduct which preclude spreading deliberate misinformation such as climate denial.
I would suggest the best thing is for engineers work together on trying to find solutions rather than denying the existence of the problem.

I agree entirely Jim, instead of the constant and continuous debate on whether or not it exists we should be working together to provide solutions for the betterment of all inhabitants of this planet.  

No sensible person would admit that the climate isn't changing. (denial as you put it)

One degree in a century and more to come, That's where the engineering focus should be on adapting to a warming planet not on fixing a problem that may or may not be human caused. We do add CO2 to the atmosphere and yes it's a warming gas and contributes to the 'greenhouse effect', again no sensible person would deny that, man made CO2 will continue to rise as third world countries Westernise.

What's wrong is the UN's IPCC 'Policy for Summery' comes before the 'Scientific Reports' as Dr Judith Curry points out in her excellent video. In other words, the science is made to fit the policy creating the blind panic to reduce man made CO2 emissions based on the results from best guess, flawed and failed Climate Models used in the reports.

I've read plenty to understand the scientific and engineering issues to make up my own mind up

Here's some information not misinformation 

wattsupwiththat.com/.../