Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 19 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 4984 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Distance between other electrical systems

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Hi all,


I've been asked this time and time again and it could be a case that I've looked at this so much that it's made me go insane, but I'd like a 2nd opinion.


When installing a TT feeder pillar on the street, does the 2.5m rule come into effect when it's located near to a PME system or does this need to be 2.5m away from all other systems which are not connected to the same earthing system (not connected to the earth mat/rod under the feeder pillar?  


My personal opinion is that they should be 2.5m away from anything that isn't on the same electrical installation (even if it's another TT system nearby) as if there's a fault with one and the path to earth is broken then the path would flow directly between the person or whatever touches it and take the route of least resistance. I have my copies of the 18th edition and the CoP for EVCEI, but I've been looking at it for so long it's made things become less clear the more questions I'm being asked about the regs!


Any help would be much appreciated,


Regards,


S
Parents
  • 0

    gkenyon:

    I still see some form of litigation nightmare happening here, unless you can clarify who owns what - and if separate duty holders, ensure there are covenants of similar in place???


    Even if the supplied chargers and lamp-posts are operated by the same duty holder, the DNO may make changes to their arrangement at any time.




    From the consumers' perspective, what we need then is for the DNOs to install these publicly available EVCPs. Perhaps some enabling legislation is required?

Reply
  • 0

    gkenyon:

    I still see some form of litigation nightmare happening here, unless you can clarify who owns what - and if separate duty holders, ensure there are covenants of similar in place???


    Even if the supplied chargers and lamp-posts are operated by the same duty holder, the DNO may make changes to their arrangement at any time.




    From the consumers' perspective, what we need then is for the DNOs to install these publicly available EVCPs. Perhaps some enabling legislation is required?

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines