Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 48 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 5978 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

EVs, Street furniture, PME and TT configurations

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Good afternoon all,


I'm part of one of the teams installing the EV charging points around London and we keep running into the same situations and problems when going through the site selection process - proximity of other electrified street furniture to the units we are installing (as well as potentially plugged in cars which is measured to the edge of the parking bay.)

Regs say that any EV installation cannot be connected to a PME system and must be converted to a TT in case of a damaged/faulty PEN conductor. Naturally if you're converting something to a TT system and not using the DNO TN-C-S earthing arrangement, there must be a reasonable distance between the TT and any other TN-C or TN-C-S systems (2m or so is reasonable).

If there were other services in the vicinity but can be proven that these have also been converted to TT and are 100% confirmed to not be using the DNO earth, would it be reasonable to say that the requirement for the 2m distance can be reduced or ignored completely? Another thought I've had is to bond the cabinets together - being on the same type of system, it makes logical sense that this would in turn reduce the Ze and improve disconnection times, both units have their methods of ADS and incorporate an RCD/RCBO of a 61008 or 61009 standard respectively.


Any other thoughts or ideas would be much appreciated as I try and figure a workaround for this issue. I understand this could work for smaller cabinets and for individual supplies, and not necessarily for street lighting which might not be adequately equipped for being converted to TT (bit of a bigger job to start installing RCDs and then giving a minor works cert etc.).
Parents
  • 0

    Parsley:



    Unfortunately separating HV and LV earthing systems on many existing sites isn't practicable.​​​




    Parsley, agreed. The current standards do permit combined HV/LV, and recommend as far as practicable something they call a global earthing system.


    The issue we are discussing here is a little different - that of a TT supply separated from the network (specifically, the PME system). However, there are situations for EV charging installations where physical separation above and below ground cannot be achieved also.


    mapj1:

    However, I suspect that there won't be many 2m long insulating joints available for upgrading gas and water mains to current standards to permit TT and PME to co-exist, and  I think that the idea that the earthing systems can always be separated in this way remains very optimistic.




    I've seen one DNO that requires 3.5 m separation. Above ground at least, arm's reach (2.5 m) would be required by BS 7671.


    My understanding is that metal gas and water mains, at least in the street, are being (or have been) replaced by plastic. Once this is completed, the place any remaining pipework (the bit up the driveway of a house, for example) is connected to the PME earthing system is in consumer's premises.


    The situation may well be muddied by supply cables which have a conductive (or effectively conductive) earthed outer sheath.


    But would it mean I can convert a whole installation to TT? Not always simple if an adjoining property is on PME. There are a number of situations where you might get caught out, e.g. two properties have roof-mounted TV antennas - the antenna systems may [should, but I know they aren't always] be earthed at one point, so if they are in arm's reach (or 3.5 m in one case) ...

     

Reply
  • 0

    Parsley:



    Unfortunately separating HV and LV earthing systems on many existing sites isn't practicable.​​​




    Parsley, agreed. The current standards do permit combined HV/LV, and recommend as far as practicable something they call a global earthing system.


    The issue we are discussing here is a little different - that of a TT supply separated from the network (specifically, the PME system). However, there are situations for EV charging installations where physical separation above and below ground cannot be achieved also.


    mapj1:

    However, I suspect that there won't be many 2m long insulating joints available for upgrading gas and water mains to current standards to permit TT and PME to co-exist, and  I think that the idea that the earthing systems can always be separated in this way remains very optimistic.




    I've seen one DNO that requires 3.5 m separation. Above ground at least, arm's reach (2.5 m) would be required by BS 7671.


    My understanding is that metal gas and water mains, at least in the street, are being (or have been) replaced by plastic. Once this is completed, the place any remaining pipework (the bit up the driveway of a house, for example) is connected to the PME earthing system is in consumer's premises.


    The situation may well be muddied by supply cables which have a conductive (or effectively conductive) earthed outer sheath.


    But would it mean I can convert a whole installation to TT? Not always simple if an adjoining property is on PME. There are a number of situations where you might get caught out, e.g. two properties have roof-mounted TV antennas - the antenna systems may [should, but I know they aren't always] be earthed at one point, so if they are in arm's reach (or 3.5 m in one case) ...

     

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines