This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

What is the best way to wire ceiling lights?

The ceiling rose junction box with its loop-in wiring is now really showing its age and is no longer a practical (or even safe) installation for most residents who wish to install fancy light fittings. It is still, however, the most common arrangement for new build houses and rewires, probably as the result of the electrician's training and how they consider it to be the norm or they cannot think of (potentially better) alternatives.


So, what is the best way to wire ceiling lights? Should neutral wires be taken to the switches or not?
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Denis McMahon:

    Will this thread run for ever?


    A scan of recent posts suggests two points of concern - junction boxes and accessibility.

    Junction boxes


    I would describe these as non-preferred; they provide extra terminal junctions in places that have no actual function. I am sure I could wire a house from scratch using no  junction boxes. I am sure most diligent electricians would prefer to do the same.

    Nonsense - My previous house was wired from 4No JB locations - these were flush 35mm deep dual socket boxes with blank plates over containing connector blocks and strategically (and discreetly) positioned for ease of access.


    All the ceiling lighting positions contained 1 cable only


    Accessibility


    Many years ago, when accessibility was less-well defined in the Regulations, I had an argument with an electrician who wanted to install a junction box where it would be plastered over. His point was that he and I knew where it was and it would be possible to cut a hole in the plaster to access it.  I would define accessibility as follows.



    • Accessible to touch: Positioned where anyone can touch in  normal living circumstances. Clearly not a place for live terminals.

    • Accessible for inspection: Positioned where they can be touched only after removing some type of cover.  This could include junction boxes in loft areas.

    • Inaccessible: Can be reached only by causing damage to the fabric of the building.

    I would argue that it's inaccessible if it requires damage to the structure of the building - removing panels or opening up a partition isn't preferable - but easily achievable. But see my point above

     

     




     

    Regards


    OMS
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Denis McMahon:

    Will this thread run for ever?


    A scan of recent posts suggests two points of concern - junction boxes and accessibility.

    Junction boxes


    I would describe these as non-preferred; they provide extra terminal junctions in places that have no actual function. I am sure I could wire a house from scratch using no  junction boxes. I am sure most diligent electricians would prefer to do the same.

    Nonsense - My previous house was wired from 4No JB locations - these were flush 35mm deep dual socket boxes with blank plates over containing connector blocks and strategically (and discreetly) positioned for ease of access.


    All the ceiling lighting positions contained 1 cable only


    Accessibility


    Many years ago, when accessibility was less-well defined in the Regulations, I had an argument with an electrician who wanted to install a junction box where it would be plastered over. His point was that he and I knew where it was and it would be possible to cut a hole in the plaster to access it.  I would define accessibility as follows.



    • Accessible to touch: Positioned where anyone can touch in  normal living circumstances. Clearly not a place for live terminals.

    • Accessible for inspection: Positioned where they can be touched only after removing some type of cover.  This could include junction boxes in loft areas.

    • Inaccessible: Can be reached only by causing damage to the fabric of the building.

    I would argue that it's inaccessible if it requires damage to the structure of the building - removing panels or opening up a partition isn't preferable - but easily achievable. But see my point above

     

     




     

    Regards


    OMS
Children
No Data