This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Omitting 30ma RCD Protection for single S/O in a domestic property

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I installed a dedicated circuit for a hifi system for a customer last year. The customer requested a 6mm2 radial from a 16A MCB housed in its own independent consumer unit into a single, un-switched socket outlet. No problem, bit unusual but no worries.I wired it using a 3c 6mm2 armoured cable as I half anticipated the forthcoming...


The hifi equipment is causing the rcd to trip when started up. I haven't been over to have a look but I am assuming that the startup current for the many power supplies (he has told me there are ten!) coupled with electronic earth leakage is causing a CPC current that is sufficient to trip the RCD (perhaps only 16ma but enough). The earthing is high integrity having a 6mm2 cpc + armour and the Zs is sufficiently low enough that the 16A MCB can be used for fault protection. So, if this wasn't domestic I'd ditch the RCD (or replace with a 100ma) assuming that my assumptions to this point are correct.


The customer has now decided he doesn't want RCD anyway for 'reasons' but I'm still wary of removing it in a domestic situation, not because I believe the installation would become less-safe but just because it contravenes regulations.


Assuming there's no fault on the equipment and it is just a case of startup/inrush current and earth leakage, what approach would you take? Remove the RCD and write it up as a deviation from 7671 with a signed disclaimer/waiver from the customer? Install a 100ma RCD? Do nothing and walk away? Something else?


Parents
  • Previously the IET described SCRD devices as:

    "installed to provide additional protection for users of the socket-outlet when it may not be advantageous to protect the entire circuit with an RCD"  

    A BEAMA press release informs us Timeguard as now manufacturing SRCDs to the new edition of the British Standard but it's being to sounds like they might as well be making chocolate teapots.


    So the older devices  which are still on sale  may be better engineered than the latest versions.


    When I contacted the IET earlier this year to ask about SRCD and FCURCD devices I was told to phone BEAMA,  I'm being to see why now. 


    Andy Betteridge
Reply
  • Previously the IET described SCRD devices as:

    "installed to provide additional protection for users of the socket-outlet when it may not be advantageous to protect the entire circuit with an RCD"  

    A BEAMA press release informs us Timeguard as now manufacturing SRCDs to the new edition of the British Standard but it's being to sounds like they might as well be making chocolate teapots.


    So the older devices  which are still on sale  may be better engineered than the latest versions.


    When I contacted the IET earlier this year to ask about SRCD and FCURCD devices I was told to phone BEAMA,  I'm being to see why now. 


    Andy Betteridge
Children
No Data