This discussion is locked.

You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Omitting 30ma RCD Protection for single S/O in a domestic property

Former Community Member over 5 years ago

I installed a dedicated circuit for a hifi system for a customer last year. The customer requested a 6mm2 radial from a 16A MCB housed in its own independent consumer unit into a single, un-switched socket outlet. No problem, bit unusual but no worries.I wired it using a 3c 6mm2 armoured cable as I half anticipated the forthcoming...

The hifi equipment is causing the rcd to trip when started up. I haven't been over to have a look but I am assuming that the startup current for the many power supplies (he has told me there are ten!) coupled with electronic earth leakage is causing a CPC current that is sufficient to trip the RCD (perhaps only 16ma but enough). The earthing is high integrity having a 6mm2 cpc + armour and the Zs is sufficiently low enough that the 16A MCB can be used for fault protection. So, if this wasn't domestic I'd ditch the RCD (or replace with a 100ma) assuming that my assumptions to this point are correct.

The customer has now decided he doesn't want RCD anyway for 'reasons' but I'm still wary of removing it in a domestic situation, not because I believe the installation would become less-safe but just because it contravenes regulations.

Assuming there's no fault on the equipment and it is just a case of startup/inrush current and earth leakage, what approach would you take? Remove the RCD and write it up as a deviation from 7671 with a signed disclaimer/waiver from the customer? Install a 100ma RCD? Do nothing and walk away? Something else?

Parents

0 mapj1 over 5 years ago

Indeed, and even if they do not meet the letter of the current standard as written, an RCD socket or spur is a good way of performing a cost-effective addition of a stair lift or whatever, such that the new bit is protected to a level equivalent to current standards, while the rest is no more dangerous than it was the day before.

One of the unintended consequences of regulation changes and restriction as to what is permitted, pushes up costs and in turn that does mean that the old stuff we were trying to get rid of tends to stay in service longer .

I fear that those informing the committees, live in million pound houses in the South East, all have TNC-s or TNS supplies, and think nothing of a few hundred quid here or there. Reality is that further from the centre, there is TT, there are fused neutrals, and 50 year old wiring is very much still in service on BS3036 fuses, and a CU change is an expensive luxury that may have to wait it's turn.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 mapj1 over 5 years ago

Indeed, and even if they do not meet the letter of the current standard as written, an RCD socket or spur is a good way of performing a cost-effective addition of a stair lift or whatever, such that the new bit is protected to a level equivalent to current standards, while the rest is no more dangerous than it was the day before.

One of the unintended consequences of regulation changes and restriction as to what is permitted, pushes up costs and in turn that does mean that the old stuff we were trying to get rid of tends to stay in service longer .

I fear that those informing the committees, live in million pound houses in the South East, all have TNC-s or TNS supplies, and think nothing of a few hundred quid here or there. Reality is that further from the centre, there is TT, there are fused neutrals, and 50 year old wiring is very much still in service on BS3036 fuses, and a CU change is an expensive luxury that may have to wait it's turn.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data

Omitting 30ma RCD Protection for single S/O in a domestic property

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Community Rules & Guidelines