This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Omitting 30ma RCD Protection for single S/O in a domestic property

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I installed a dedicated circuit for a hifi system for a customer last year. The customer requested a 6mm2 radial from a 16A MCB housed in its own independent consumer unit into a single, un-switched socket outlet. No problem, bit unusual but no worries.I wired it using a 3c 6mm2 armoured cable as I half anticipated the forthcoming...


The hifi equipment is causing the rcd to trip when started up. I haven't been over to have a look but I am assuming that the startup current for the many power supplies (he has told me there are ten!) coupled with electronic earth leakage is causing a CPC current that is sufficient to trip the RCD (perhaps only 16ma but enough). The earthing is high integrity having a 6mm2 cpc + armour and the Zs is sufficiently low enough that the 16A MCB can be used for fault protection. So, if this wasn't domestic I'd ditch the RCD (or replace with a 100ma) assuming that my assumptions to this point are correct.


The customer has now decided he doesn't want RCD anyway for 'reasons' but I'm still wary of removing it in a domestic situation, not because I believe the installation would become less-safe but just because it contravenes regulations.


Assuming there's no fault on the equipment and it is just a case of startup/inrush current and earth leakage, what approach would you take? Remove the RCD and write it up as a deviation from 7671 with a signed disclaimer/waiver from the customer? Install a 100ma RCD? Do nothing and walk away? Something else?


Parents
  • So, the acid safety test is "does an RCD socket, or a spur to BS 7288 of any revision, provide an equivalent level of safety to a circuit with an upstream RCD, when fitted to an otherwise identical circuit with no RCD protection upstream.? "


    I'd suggest that for an end user holding a portable widget or leaning on the class I appliance, the list of fault conditions it mitigates are similar, nay, identical, but without the extra trudge to reset or test it. Of course it cannot protect cables in the walls, but that is a given, and they could be in earthed conduit or surface wired for the purposes of this thought experiment.
Reply
  • So, the acid safety test is "does an RCD socket, or a spur to BS 7288 of any revision, provide an equivalent level of safety to a circuit with an upstream RCD, when fitted to an otherwise identical circuit with no RCD protection upstream.? "


    I'd suggest that for an end user holding a portable widget or leaning on the class I appliance, the list of fault conditions it mitigates are similar, nay, identical, but without the extra trudge to reset or test it. Of course it cannot protect cables in the walls, but that is a given, and they could be in earthed conduit or surface wired for the purposes of this thought experiment.
Children
No Data