This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Omitting 30ma RCD Protection for single S/O in a domestic property

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I installed a dedicated circuit for a hifi system for a customer last year. The customer requested a 6mm2 radial from a 16A MCB housed in its own independent consumer unit into a single, un-switched socket outlet. No problem, bit unusual but no worries.I wired it using a 3c 6mm2 armoured cable as I half anticipated the forthcoming...


The hifi equipment is causing the rcd to trip when started up. I haven't been over to have a look but I am assuming that the startup current for the many power supplies (he has told me there are ten!) coupled with electronic earth leakage is causing a CPC current that is sufficient to trip the RCD (perhaps only 16ma but enough). The earthing is high integrity having a 6mm2 cpc + armour and the Zs is sufficiently low enough that the 16A MCB can be used for fault protection. So, if this wasn't domestic I'd ditch the RCD (or replace with a 100ma) assuming that my assumptions to this point are correct.


The customer has now decided he doesn't want RCD anyway for 'reasons' but I'm still wary of removing it in a domestic situation, not because I believe the installation would become less-safe but just because it contravenes regulations.


Assuming there's no fault on the equipment and it is just a case of startup/inrush current and earth leakage, what approach would you take? Remove the RCD and write it up as a deviation from 7671 with a signed disclaimer/waiver from the customer? Install a 100ma RCD? Do nothing and walk away? Something else?


Parents

  • AJJewsbury:




    Andy, please see my posting of 11 Aug, which gives some context.



    I had thanks - it was the preceding sentence (my emphasis):


    :

    SRCDs are only intended to provide supplementary protection downstream of the SRCD.
    SRCDs are intended for use in circuits where the fault protection and additional protection are already assured upstream of the SRCD.


    :





    that hinted to me that the author (or authoring committee) might have had a particular point in mind that perhaps wasn't expressed clearly in the words of the second of those sentences when taken alone. However I'm always a bit uneasy reading bit of text extracted from a larger document  - a sometimes a preceding paragraph or chapter title on the bottom of the previous page can shed quite a different light on things.


    Well, no form of RCD could protect the circuit upstream.


    BS 7288 states that the characteristics of circuit-protective and socket-protective RCDs are different, but doesn't seem to describe the differences or explain them.


    At one time, Hampshire Libraries subscribed to the British Standards, but no more. Happily for me, as an Open University student, I have access through its library.

Reply

  • AJJewsbury:




    Andy, please see my posting of 11 Aug, which gives some context.



    I had thanks - it was the preceding sentence (my emphasis):


    :

    SRCDs are only intended to provide supplementary protection downstream of the SRCD.
    SRCDs are intended for use in circuits where the fault protection and additional protection are already assured upstream of the SRCD.


    :





    that hinted to me that the author (or authoring committee) might have had a particular point in mind that perhaps wasn't expressed clearly in the words of the second of those sentences when taken alone. However I'm always a bit uneasy reading bit of text extracted from a larger document  - a sometimes a preceding paragraph or chapter title on the bottom of the previous page can shed quite a different light on things.


    Well, no form of RCD could protect the circuit upstream.


    BS 7288 states that the characteristics of circuit-protective and socket-protective RCDs are different, but doesn't seem to describe the differences or explain them.


    At one time, Hampshire Libraries subscribed to the British Standards, but no more. Happily for me, as an Open University student, I have access through its library.

Children
No Data