This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Omitting 30ma RCD Protection for single S/O in a domestic property

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I installed a dedicated circuit for a hifi system for a customer last year. The customer requested a 6mm2 radial from a 16A MCB housed in its own independent consumer unit into a single, un-switched socket outlet. No problem, bit unusual but no worries.I wired it using a 3c 6mm2 armoured cable as I half anticipated the forthcoming...


The hifi equipment is causing the rcd to trip when started up. I haven't been over to have a look but I am assuming that the startup current for the many power supplies (he has told me there are ten!) coupled with electronic earth leakage is causing a CPC current that is sufficient to trip the RCD (perhaps only 16ma but enough). The earthing is high integrity having a 6mm2 cpc + armour and the Zs is sufficiently low enough that the 16A MCB can be used for fault protection. So, if this wasn't domestic I'd ditch the RCD (or replace with a 100ma) assuming that my assumptions to this point are correct.


The customer has now decided he doesn't want RCD anyway for 'reasons' but I'm still wary of removing it in a domestic situation, not because I believe the installation would become less-safe but just because it contravenes regulations.


Assuming there's no fault on the equipment and it is just a case of startup/inrush current and earth leakage, what approach would you take? Remove the RCD and write it up as a deviation from 7671 with a signed disclaimer/waiver from the customer? Install a 100ma RCD? Do nothing and walk away? Something else?


Parents
  • Perhaps the change is due to the more mandatory nature of additional protection, this is a Socket circuit regardless the accessory being an SRCD one or not....so with an SRCD you could have part of the upstream circuit not having additional protection but the appliance plugged into SRCD will have AP

    Possibly the wording, perhaps imperfectly, is covering a potential issue of an SRCD socket being replaced with an ordinary one ?


    ​​​​​​

Reply
  • Perhaps the change is due to the more mandatory nature of additional protection, this is a Socket circuit regardless the accessory being an SRCD one or not....so with an SRCD you could have part of the upstream circuit not having additional protection but the appliance plugged into SRCD will have AP

    Possibly the wording, perhaps imperfectly, is covering a potential issue of an SRCD socket being replaced with an ordinary one ?


    ​​​​​​

Children
No Data