Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 40 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 3501 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

When is a spark an arc? OR - When is an arc a spark?

whjohnson
Just watched some chap on the E5 youtube channel visiting Eaton in Austria. Eaton AFDDs have been something of a subject of ridicule in youtubeland, with various respected electrical content providers demonstrating through various real-world means that they don't function. So, off this chap goes to Eaton's HQ in Vienna where they provide him with a aluminium case full of test kit, complete with the Eaton logo and fitted out with various Eaton devices inside.

One of the devices is the Eaton AFFDD which has famously failed to operate on numerous youtube video presentations.

Of course, it trips when tested with their own test kit. After all, no point in trying to sell something which isn't really needed unless you can demonstrate that it actually works, so Eaton helpfully provides the 'right' arc signature so that the device can trip on command in front of all those cynical doubters.


Apparently, all those heath robinson youtubers have been getting it wrong because they have unhelpfully been simulating real world arcing events which these devices won't actually pick up. You see, according to the 'experts' you need an arc instead of a spark to trip the device! What the hell is the difference?


Oh how I laughed! Is this how far they'll go to flog you some old tat you don't really need?

Just how many different arcs and sparks are there out there? Has anyone told David Attenborough of all these new species to explore?


Feel free to jump in!
Parents
  • 0
    That is interesting to know, thought it simply transfers the question to be asking if the EN standard 'arc' fault waveform actually represents the sort of current waveform  you would get with a real fault of the kind you should disconnect.

    This is very different to testing RCDs where we are all agreed that the test rig and the faults are similar, here I suspect there are real loads that look like arc faults, and arc faults that have signatures  nothing like the standard test waveform.

    With modern electronics it is possible to interrupt and reconnect in almost arbitrary speed and precision,  so making an AFD  tester that spits out a very complex set of test waveforms is a technically trivial matter - the hard work is agreeing what the waveforms  should be.

    I'm not sold on the idea myself, I thing we are some way from a useful item.
Reply
  • 0
    That is interesting to know, thought it simply transfers the question to be asking if the EN standard 'arc' fault waveform actually represents the sort of current waveform  you would get with a real fault of the kind you should disconnect.

    This is very different to testing RCDs where we are all agreed that the test rig and the faults are similar, here I suspect there are real loads that look like arc faults, and arc faults that have signatures  nothing like the standard test waveform.

    With modern electronics it is possible to interrupt and reconnect in almost arbitrary speed and precision,  so making an AFD  tester that spits out a very complex set of test waveforms is a technically trivial matter - the hard work is agreeing what the waveforms  should be.

    I'm not sold on the idea myself, I thing we are some way from a useful item.
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines