This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

When is a spark an arc? OR - When is an arc a spark?

Just watched some chap on the E5 youtube channel visiting Eaton in Austria. Eaton AFDDs have been something of a subject of ridicule in youtubeland, with various respected electrical content providers demonstrating through various real-world means that they don't function. So, off this chap goes to Eaton's HQ in Vienna where they provide him with a aluminium case full of test kit, complete with the Eaton logo and fitted out with various Eaton devices inside.

One of the devices is the Eaton AFFDD which has famously failed to operate on numerous youtube video presentations.

Of course, it trips when tested with their own test kit. After all, no point in trying to sell something which isn't really needed unless you can demonstrate that it actually works, so Eaton helpfully provides the 'right' arc signature so that the device can trip on command in front of all those cynical doubters.


Apparently, all those heath robinson youtubers have been getting it wrong because they have unhelpfully been simulating real world arcing events which these devices won't actually pick up. You see, according to the 'experts' you need an arc instead of a spark to trip the device! What the hell is the difference?


Oh how I laughed! Is this how far they'll go to flog you some old tat you don't really need?

Just how many different arcs and sparks are there out there? Has anyone told David Attenborough of all these new species to explore?


Feel free to jump in!
Parents

  • whjohnson:

    I don't know. Can you be held liable for not following a 'recommendation' rather then a regulatory requirement?

    If so, that could open up a whole different can of worms.




    If it is a statutory requirement, there could be a statutory penalty, which might even be a criminal one!


    As for liability in negligence, there has to be a breach of the duty of care. In establishing that, the Court will compare the action taken with whatever standard there may be. Perfection is not required, but a reasonable standard is.


    So is your PI insurance in date? ?

Reply

  • whjohnson:

    I don't know. Can you be held liable for not following a 'recommendation' rather then a regulatory requirement?

    If so, that could open up a whole different can of worms.




    If it is a statutory requirement, there could be a statutory penalty, which might even be a criminal one!


    As for liability in negligence, there has to be a breach of the duty of care. In establishing that, the Court will compare the action taken with whatever standard there may be. Perfection is not required, but a reasonable standard is.


    So is your PI insurance in date? ?

Children
No Data