This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Supplementary CPC/SWA Resistance Ratio

Evening all, as the title above i am just trying to get my head around how a supplementary CPC will help lower the Zs to achieve a sufficent 5s disconnection time. My thinking is that the SWA and CPC are supplementary mechanically connected at both earth bars (supply and load) so the fault current will divide based on the resistance ratio (even if it takes the longer route through the supplementary CPC if there was a fault on the amour to line conductor).

 

I have attached a sketch of this for clarity. 


I also know strapping a cpc on the side of the armour is bad practise, however im just trying to get my head around the principles.
Parents
  • John,


    Makes sense, im assuming the choking effect is what is discussed in Annex NA (taken from GN8) as the screenshot attached. I cannot find this annex anyway, could you expand on what you mean of the choking effect - Is it that the higher resistance of the steel armouring will initially lower the fault current?
Reply
  • John,


    Makes sense, im assuming the choking effect is what is discussed in Annex NA (taken from GN8) as the screenshot attached. I cannot find this annex anyway, could you expand on what you mean of the choking effect - Is it that the higher resistance of the steel armouring will initially lower the fault current?
Children
No Data