This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Tingles from lead flashing on house with solar array - anyone else seen this?

A long phone call today with a good friend who is a Niciec Contractor, who is now facing a rather odd problem with a domestic solar array installed by others. The DC string cables from the panels on the roof to the inverter run along some distance under lead flashing, and now workers on the roof are reporting tingles from the metal flashing when standing on their scaffolding.

As part of the testing , the cables have been checked and are isolated from the metal and not damaged in any way. There is a rather variable AC voltage on the lead, relative to the scaffolding, which is at more or less the same as local earth potential. The measured voltage is considerably more when the inverter is on though does not fall completely to zero when it is not.

Now I have not seen the set up, as it is many miles away, but as the voltage is so variable depending on conditions, I am minded to suggest it is capacitive coupling between the DC string cables and the adjacent metal.

I'm also going to suggest earthing the flashing in any case.

However, has anyone else with more experience of modern domestic solar installation ever seen this sort of thing?

 And am I even right in assuming the inverter  action means DC strings are commutating at 50Hz relative to the mains, as would be needed to explain this effect?

Or am I going up the wrong tree altogether ?


The inverter suppliers are not much help, being more of a kit supplier than technical experts on what they stock, and this is not in their FAQ.

Parents
  • Broadgage is right that "DC" on a PV array will contain grid frequency (and HF switching) superimposed on it. The magnitude, and whether it is centred around the same point as the DC, depends upon the inverter construction (older inverters with transformers have somehat less). This does to capacitive voltages between the array frame (and by extension, anything in electrical contact with it) and system/true earth, which will also vary with weather conditions.


    The UK guidance used to be that PV array frames should be floating unless brought into the equipotential zone by other building components (amongst other reasons), because the equipment itself should be Class 2 and bonding to the MET a) Means exporting the PME earth outside the building envelope, if it's PME, and b) Provides a return path for leakage current, and hence fun with RCDs we're getting used to now. (Transformerless inverters were rarer when that guidance was written though). We were brought closer to European practice with the IET Code of Practice, which expects that the frame will be bonded in all circumstances.


    Jam
Reply
  • Broadgage is right that "DC" on a PV array will contain grid frequency (and HF switching) superimposed on it. The magnitude, and whether it is centred around the same point as the DC, depends upon the inverter construction (older inverters with transformers have somehat less). This does to capacitive voltages between the array frame (and by extension, anything in electrical contact with it) and system/true earth, which will also vary with weather conditions.


    The UK guidance used to be that PV array frames should be floating unless brought into the equipotential zone by other building components (amongst other reasons), because the equipment itself should be Class 2 and bonding to the MET a) Means exporting the PME earth outside the building envelope, if it's PME, and b) Provides a return path for leakage current, and hence fun with RCDs we're getting used to now. (Transformerless inverters were rarer when that guidance was written though). We were brought closer to European practice with the IET Code of Practice, which expects that the frame will be bonded in all circumstances.


    Jam
Children
No Data