This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Social Housing EICR Contract

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
OK. Id be very grateful for some experienced testers opinions regarding how they would proceed if they were in my shoes.


I accepted a contract carrying out EICR's for a social housing contract.


Now, I havent been doing EICR's since 2015. Back then I would charge a day rate and test every circuit 100%.


Probably the biggest part of how I used to do things was disconnecting every last piece of current using equipment and doing I.R between neutral and line, line and earth and neutral and earth. It used to take a lot of effort to find every piece of equipment and often things were found which the customer, despite living in the property all their lives didnt know existed.


Here I have 1.5 hours per property, we arent allowed to leave FI, C1 or C2 problems (withing reson of course but generally theres a lot to sort out)


1st question - If your R1 + R2 value is lower than either your RN or your R1 continuity tests - What would that tell you and what would you do to prove the circuit is ok for continued use in its current state?


2nd question - If you had either excessively high, or no continuity on R1, RN or R2 end to end readings, how can you quickly and simply prove the circuit is stilll safe for use without getting deep in to further investigation?


3th question - When doing an I.R test whereby........ line+neutral are connected together and tested to earth - Is there any electronic or electrical device which, if connected, could result in a test failing the circuit? I had one today 0.79 ohms


Parents
  • Ignoring the fact that others have pointed out,  that in that time at best it will probably be mostly a 'visual only ' inspection, and anything with complexity more than a garden shed with one light and a double socket circuit is going to take longer...


    (There is a tendency to do very weak testing, and repeat it too  often, instead of a full drains-up but less frequently which would represent better value. Price and a desire for some paper with a recent date is the driver)


    The tech bit

    1st question - If your R1 + R2 value is lower than either your RN or your R1 continuity tests - What would that tell you and what would you do to prove the circuit is ok for continued use in its current state?




    R2 cound be very low, and no fault, the classic is a return via  plumbing from a water heater, but there are other similar cases.

    On a ring main, the two halves of the ring main (at the far point on the ring) appear in parallel.

    If you want a test to make some sense of this, measure as 2 spurs separately (by breaking the ring and testing call it  the Left hand pair only, and measuring L-E  to the dis board, then changing the short to the right hand L-E pair) you must combine the results (using the parallel R formula.) This also allows you to see how far round the ring you really are, and that you are not in the middle of a spur which may not be obvious on inspection on an unknown circuit.






    2nd question - If you had either excessively high, or no continuity on R1, RN or R2 end to end readings, how can you quickly and simply prove the circuit is still safe for use without getting deep in to further investigation?




    If it is a Radial, you cannot, it i broken. If it is a ring,  it may be 'crab claws' and still have power and earth to every point. It is not nice, but it is possible to drop the breaker to 20A and make it a centre fed radial. But if there is ring-round on 2 out of 3,  say L and N but not E or similar, then it is a dead cert that something nasty has happened.






    3th question - When doing an I.R test whereby........ line+neutral are connected together and tested to earth - Is there any electronic or electrical device which, if connected, could result in a test failing the circuit? I had one today 0.79 ohms




    If it really is 079 ohms, that is comparable to the R1 R2 etc and represents a dead short, The only electronics that will do that is faulty.

    If it is really much higher but that is what your meter says, then I'd be looking for leakage to TV antennas and other cables that leave the building. If it is  whole building L+N to E and the building has a lot of kit in, 0.79 meg may be OK.

    If you to L+N to CPC lifted,  and compare with L+N to CPC + MET + Bonding   you will be able to see if the leakage is to the CPC, or to an external thing, or both.

    Also repeat at 120 or 250V test voltage, if the value is much higher at lower voltage is electronics or a neon.


Reply
  • Ignoring the fact that others have pointed out,  that in that time at best it will probably be mostly a 'visual only ' inspection, and anything with complexity more than a garden shed with one light and a double socket circuit is going to take longer...


    (There is a tendency to do very weak testing, and repeat it too  often, instead of a full drains-up but less frequently which would represent better value. Price and a desire for some paper with a recent date is the driver)


    The tech bit

    1st question - If your R1 + R2 value is lower than either your RN or your R1 continuity tests - What would that tell you and what would you do to prove the circuit is ok for continued use in its current state?




    R2 cound be very low, and no fault, the classic is a return via  plumbing from a water heater, but there are other similar cases.

    On a ring main, the two halves of the ring main (at the far point on the ring) appear in parallel.

    If you want a test to make some sense of this, measure as 2 spurs separately (by breaking the ring and testing call it  the Left hand pair only, and measuring L-E  to the dis board, then changing the short to the right hand L-E pair) you must combine the results (using the parallel R formula.) This also allows you to see how far round the ring you really are, and that you are not in the middle of a spur which may not be obvious on inspection on an unknown circuit.






    2nd question - If you had either excessively high, or no continuity on R1, RN or R2 end to end readings, how can you quickly and simply prove the circuit is still safe for use without getting deep in to further investigation?




    If it is a Radial, you cannot, it i broken. If it is a ring,  it may be 'crab claws' and still have power and earth to every point. It is not nice, but it is possible to drop the breaker to 20A and make it a centre fed radial. But if there is ring-round on 2 out of 3,  say L and N but not E or similar, then it is a dead cert that something nasty has happened.






    3th question - When doing an I.R test whereby........ line+neutral are connected together and tested to earth - Is there any electronic or electrical device which, if connected, could result in a test failing the circuit? I had one today 0.79 ohms




    If it really is 079 ohms, that is comparable to the R1 R2 etc and represents a dead short, The only electronics that will do that is faulty.

    If it is really much higher but that is what your meter says, then I'd be looking for leakage to TV antennas and other cables that leave the building. If it is  whole building L+N to E and the building has a lot of kit in, 0.79 meg may be OK.

    If you to L+N to CPC lifted,  and compare with L+N to CPC + MET + Bonding   you will be able to see if the leakage is to the CPC, or to an external thing, or both.

    Also repeat at 120 or 250V test voltage, if the value is much higher at lower voltage is electronics or a neon.


Children
No Data