Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 22 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 6426 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

RCBO's and IR testing

Jaymack
I have had a problem with 5 off Wylex RCBO's. These were bought by a houseowner and fitted by him as there was no RCD protection for some circuits requiring such. These Wylex RCBO's have a warning hidden on the body that connections should be disconnected for Insulation Testing ..........too late the man cried!. For expediency and availability, I have redesigned the arrangement to have MCB's with a common RCBO as a M.S..

I have been in contact with Wylex technical help, who say that they should have been OK to withstand 250V IR testing as in this case, but to return them to the dealer. Anyone else have had similar problems?


Jaymack .
  • 0

    I have a HSE document somewhere in which they refer to 30mA RCDs as effective insulation monitors.




    Not wishing to blow my own piano but I said that years ago. Am I due any royalties?


    Z.

  • 0
    If insulation resistance testing used in periodic I+T was a commercial product, I would fear for it. The modern installation is full of electronic equipment and where there is global 30mA RCD protection, I simply wouldn’t bother. Sure you might need it in fault diagnosis but it just isn’t worth the effort in a standard periodic inspection where every circuit has RCBO protection. There are far more important things to attend to. I have a HSE document somewhere in which they refer to 30mA RCDs as effective insulation monitors.
  • 0
    Which Wylex RCBOs are they?


    The new double pole RCBOs advertised benefits include:


    “Wylex RCBOs go one step further, they have switched neutral built in as standard, live and neutral conductors do not have to be disconnected for insulation resistance testing. This saves time and money, particularly for responsible landlords who regularly test installations during occupancy voids.”

    Electrium
  • 0
    AFDD- Arc Fault Detection Devices are on the list of equipment that cannot be subjected to a 500 volt global insulation tests.


     Andy Betteridge.
  • 0
    I increasingly think that subject to a pass at 500 V on initial verification, a good result at 250 V will do for a periodic.


    These devices seem to make a whole-board IR test at 500 V impossible.


    My 17th+3 version of GN3 makes the point that functional earths should be disconnected and has a list of devices as long as your arm which are vulnerable to IR testing. It makes me wonder whether anybody will want to prepare reports for private landlords.


    And BTW, if an SRCD needs to be disconnected (as MK recommend) and two or more are fed from a ring, how do you IR test it? The same may apply to USB sockets.
  • 0
    there is not, but the internal electronics is powered from the load side - if it was not, it would be in an effectivly unfused supply.

    However, I too am surprised it cannot stand a short flight to 500VDC, as it is supposed to take mains all day, and surges of a few kV.

    It is a bit of an oversight in the product spec that connection of test gear was not foreseen and put on the list of things to test and must survive.

    Equally I think surviving 400VAC from a lost neutral event should also be there in the list of approved tests, but it seems that too isn't.
  • 0

     



     

    I agree with the comments here, the RCBO's have open circuited and had to be replaced,    

     




    I can't understand just why this should have happened. Surely the contacts are just mechanical in operation. I do assume that there is no continuity between the supply side and load side terminals.


    Z.

  • 0
    The miniature Wylex RCBOs are exactly the same as the Crabtree ones. I have never had any issues with the wylex ones.

    Nick
  • 0
    You could reasonably argue that anyone who is competant enough to test safely should also have the knowledge of the risk to sensitive devices and appliances otherwise have no business testing. Householder or electrician. A little knowledge can be a bad (dangerous?) thing
  • 0
    Further to my previous post, there is a make of RCBO that only needs to be switched off for IR testing a CU,

    This article is from October 24th 2018. To quote "However, all of that can be avoided with Crabtree Miniature RCBOs, as they are two-pole switching devices. The only thing that has to be done to get a circuit ready for an insulation resistance test is to switch the device off. This saves time and money from your annual budget on essential testing, and provides higher levels of protection for all who interact with it. In a single second the circuit is ready to test. There’s no need to disconnect the circuit cables, no need to attach test leads, and no need to be concerned about reconnecting cables either. All of which makes this testing process easier, faster, safer and cheaper too". see the link


    Jaymack

    https://www.electrium.co.uk/news/rcbo-spells-savings-for-testing

Community Rules & Guidelines