The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Temperature rating of C.B's, cables and conduits

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Question 1: All PVC conduits in market to BS:61386 are rated for 60C operating temp while CU/PVC single core wires to IEC 60228 are rated for 70C. what is the BS 7671 point of view.
Question 2: BS 7671 section 512.1.5 states that :Switchgear, protective devices, accessories and other types of equipment shall not be connected to conductors

intended to operate at a temperature exceeding 70°C at the equipment in normal service unless the equipment manufacturer has confirmed that the equipment is suitable for such conditions, or the conductor size shall be chosen based on the current ratings for 70° C cables of a similar construction. where as NEC 110.14(c): “Conductors with temperature ratings higher than specified for terminations shall be permitted to be used for ampacity adjustment,correction, or both.” Derating factors may be required because of the number of conductors in a conduit, higher ambient temperatures, or internal design requirements for a facility. By beginning the derating process at the ampacity of the conductor based on the higher insulation value, you may not be required to upsize the conductor to compensate for the derating.is there a similar way to apply the exception of NEC using the BS 7671.

  • Question 1: All PVC conduits in market to BS:61386 are rated for 60C operating temp while CU/PVC single core wires to IEC 60228 are rated for 70C. what is the BS 7671 point of view.



    BS 7671 doesn't state anything clearly, but it sounds reasonable to me - if the copper conductor is at 70 degrees and ambient is 30 degrees (or below) then they will be a decent temperature gradient across the basic insulation, any air gap and the walls of the conduit. Generally if the copper is at 70 degrees I wouldn't expect the outside of the insulation to be above 60.


    Question 2: BS 7671 section 512.1.5 states that :Switchgear, protective devices, accessories and other types of equipment shall not be connected to conductors

    intended to operate at a temperature exceeding 70°C at the equipment in normal service unless the equipment manufacturer has confirmed that the equipment is suitable for such conditions, or the conductor size shall be chosen based on the current ratings for 70° C cables of a similar construction. where as NEC 110.14(c): “Conductors with temperature ratings higher than specified for terminations shall be permitted to be used for ampacity adjustment,correction, or both.” Derating factors may be required because of the number of conductors in a conduit, higher ambient temperatures, or internal design requirements for a facility. By beginning the derating process at the ampacity of the conductor based on the higher insulation value, you may not be required to upsize the conductor to compensate for the derating.is there a similar way to apply the exception of NEC using the BS 7671.



    I'm not sure I follow - the idea normally is to make sure the conductor temperature doesn't exceed what the terminals can withstand (which is usually 70 degrees for UK/European products). If you need to de-rate a say 90 degree conductor due to grouping or high ambient temperatures of installation conditions (e.g. thermal insulation) then you'd still expect it to run at 90 degrees at that reduced load - so the problem with overheating the terminals would remain. (I'm not entirely sure what the yanks mean by 'ampacity adjustment' etc.)


    If however the de-rating factors only apply to other parts of the run, and not where the cable meets the terminals, you could well find that a 90-degree cable has a 70-degree or less operating temperature at the terminals - which would be fine. Using the 70-degree tables for just the short length of cable that connects to the terminals should confirm that.


    BS 7671 is a little inflexible in that you can sometimes get a better result by taking 90 degree ratings and derating them to get a 70-degree conductor temperature than you can by using 70-degree tables directly (apparently because the 70 degree tables presume PVC insulation while the 90 degree tables presume XLPE - which has a low thermal resistance) - but then you always have the option of using cable manufacturer's (or other similar sources of data) in preference to BS 7671's tables, so there's some flexibility there still.


      - Andy.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Dear Andy, I share your wonders concerning that derating 90c conductor for installation condition would end up that conductor is operating at 90c but would you please clarify what you mean by  “that you can sometimes get a better result by taking 90 degree ratings and derating them to get a 70-degree conductor temperature than you can by using 70-degree tables directly” because I think there is a contradiction. and how one can guarantee the operating temp is 70c.

  • MOESEB:

     CU/PVC single core wires to IEC 60228 are rated for 70C. 




    IEC 60228 is the standard for the 'Conductors of insulated cables', so only deals with the copper (or aluminium), not the insulation, and therefore does not have a temperature rating. You will need to check what standard covers the insulation of the PVC. I know the Americans have what they call 'High Temperature PVC' which they allow to operate at 105°C, though I can't remember seeing that accepted elsewhere.

    The temperature rating assigned generally dictates the testing requirements so in theory as cable tested as suitable for 70°C should be able to operate at that temperature (though the more I find out about the testing regime the less confidence I have in the tests definitively proving suitability anyway, but that is a different story).


  • but would you please clarify what you mean by  “that you can sometimes get a better result by taking 90 degree ratings and derating them to get a 70-degree conductor temperature than you can by using 70-degree tables directly” because I think there is a contradiction. and how one can guarantee the operating temp is 70c.



    There's a formula relating the derating of a cable to its conductor temperature (I don't have it to hand but should be able to dig it out if needs be) - from memory it's similar to the one for adjusting voltage drop when a cable isn't fully loaded. I'm sure I've seen it used to justify the use of 1.5mm² MICC cable on ring circuits in one of the IET books - showing that the 70 degree terminal temperature isn't exceeded.


    Anyhow I wanted to show that 4mm² BS 8436 (circular) cable was good for 32A method B with 70 degree conductor temperature - the 70 degree tabulated rating (4D2A) was only 30A, but taking the 90 degree rating from table 4E2A (40A) and applying the de-rating factor from the formula handily gave 32A. On the face of it that sounds inconsistent, but I think the difference is accounted for by (thermoplastic) PVC used in 70 degree cables having a higher thermal insulation value than (thermosetting) XLPE used in 90 degree ones - hence all else being equal the XPLE insulated conductor can produce a little more heat (by carrying a little more current) than the PVC insulated one for the same conductor temperature.


      - Andy.


  • AJJewsbury:


    On the face of it that sounds inconsistent, but I think the difference is accounted for by PVC  having a higher thermal insulation value than XLPE 


    Andy,

    You are making a big assumption here - that there is logic behind the cable rating figures. I know of various standards where the cable current ratings would not stand up to a rigorous scrutiny as to their basis. However having been around for decades and no-one questioning them does mean that they are accepted as valid, and after all if they have not given any problems then who is to say that they shouldn't continue to be used.


  • You are making a big assumption here - that there is logic behind the cable rating figures.



    I'm sure there's some logic. Maybe not a single consistent approach though, I agree.


    At one point I tried re-scaling the OSG's table of R1+R2 values (given at 20 degrees) to various other temperatures (just to see the difference temperature could make to test results) - and realised that some of values for 70 degrees should match the mV/A/m tables (at least for smaller sizes where reactance is ignored) - which of course they didn't quite. The official reply seemed to be that both were right .... each in their own way.


       - Andy.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    AJJewsbury:

    There's a formula relating the derating of a cable to its conductor temperature (I don't have it to hand but should be able to dig it out if needs be) - from memory it's similar to the one for adjusting voltage drop when a cable isn't fully loaded. I'm sure I've seen it used to justify the use of 1.5mm² MICC cable on ring circuits in one of the IET books - showing that the 70 degree terminal temperature isn't exceeded.



    You mean Formulas such as Neher-Magrath or that which are found in IEC-60287 or is there another formula in BS-7671.

    I usually use ETAP to find actual operating temperatures of cables for Under ground systems but I can't find easy equation for another mode of installations.

  • You mean Formulas such as Neher-Magrath or that which are found in IEC-60287 or is there another formula in BS-7671.

    I usually use ETAP to find actual operating temperatures of cables for Under ground systems but I can't find easy equation for another mode of installations. 



    I've (to my shame) no idea what the formula is called or where it's originally from. I'm pretty sure it doesn't appear in BS 7671 in this form, although it does have some similarity to equation 6 in appendix 4 of BS 7671 if you strip out all the correction factors.


    I've dug it out - this is an extract from the IET's Commentary on the Wiring Regulations, 16th Ed which probably explains it better than I could ever paraphrase. (it's way out of date now of course, but the underlying physics won't have changed I'm sure):

    8d464cf8fce7f0b9103de4ff7b0e720e-huge-extractfromcommentary16thed_conductortemp.jpg


       - Andy.
  • Andy the  Neher & McGrath forumula is explained here 


    It includes terms for the temperature gradient across the insulation, and the change of resistance when in use relative to a cold DC reading.  If you allow both if these effects to tend to zero, what is left can be re-arranged from "what is the current at X temperature?", to "what is the temperature at Y current?" , this becomes the same as the forumla used in the IET analysis.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    AJJewsbury:




    You mean Formulas such as Neher-Magrath or that which are found in IEC-60287 or is there another formula in BS-7671.

    I usually use ETAP to find actual operating temperatures of cables for Under ground systems but I can't find easy equation for another mode of installations. 



    I've (to my shame) no idea what the formula is called or where it's originally from. I'm pretty sure it doesn't appear in BS 7671 in this form, although it does have some similarity to equation 6 in appendix 4 of BS 7671 if you strip out all the correction factors.


    I've dug it out - this is an extract from the IET's Commentary on the Wiring Regulations, 16th Ed which probably explains it better than I could ever paraphrase. (it's way out of date now of course, but the underlying physics won't have changed I'm sure):

    8d464cf8fce7f0b9103de4ff7b0e720e-huge-extractfromcommentary16thed_conductortemp.jpg


       - Andy.

     



    So Interesting equation I've been searching for such equation for long time.I like the idea to estimate the operating temp of a conductor before even loading it. and the idea is that it's so simple and no need for a software. But Thomas Cook didn't mention a normative or engineering reference or how did he derive this equation.It is vague.