Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 16 replies
  • Subscribers 30 subscribers
  • Views 3733 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Switched alternative to public supply. Tesla Powerwall and gateway. Have I got this right?

justinneedham
Who here has first-hand of Tesla Powerwall? On cursory inspection, on-line technical info is sparse.


One of my regular domestic customers has had a quote for a Tesla Powerwall, including the Tesla isolating gateway to allow some property consumption in selected backup circuit(s) during network outage. Meanwhile I am quoting for CU upgrade to go in ahead of that work so that it can take place. The latter is basic work, no problems, were it not for the former which is providing me with a bit of a conceptual challenge. Now the first bit below is second-hand from the Tesla installer via my customer. Hence parts of it might be lost in translation, but as far as I have received from Tesla installer:


"Go ahead and to the CU, - it won't affect the Tesla."

The Tesla gateway contains SPD so I "don't need" to fit SPD in my CU. (But Tesla only up to 1KV, so not fully meeting AFAICT, 442.2.2)

Now the biggie: Tesla say they will be fitting a separate earth rod such that (as far as I understand it..), when the gateway entirely disconnects the network including earthing conductor (which after the supply head is no longer PEN 461.2).. then the gateway  "islands" the whole property on the TT via it's switch 537.1.5. 551.6 .


I'm not so familiar with switched alternative to public supplies, and in the absence of anything from Tesla, those who are able to might add to my reasoning below (or otherwise abuse it):


1) The property bonding and MET would still be connected to incoming PEN via gas/water pipe and next-door house(s).

2) What happens to the Tesla earth rod in normal (grid connected) operation? I'm guessing it's wired by the installer such it's effectively just a bonded extraneous conductive part. 

3) Under loss of network power, Tesla gateway disconnects incoming supply and TNCS earthing conductor and now floats on the parallel impedance of it's Ra and the bonding. During this time,the disconnected property would (due to high-ish Ra) likely get bootstrapped close to whatever voltage is on the incoming gas/water/bonding.

4) Although there are two earthing systems, there aren't two simultaneously accessible earthing systems..  Because in normal (network) use the TT electrode would be just a bonded extraneous part, and in "island" mode the TNCS earthing is not connected, - But to make this claim, we'd then need to also state that the TNCS "not-MET" (with installation earth no longer connected) was a bonded extraneous conductive part. 

5) Loss of PEN externally: The Tesla I'm guessing would detect any possible lift in earth potential of the TNCS MET and could then switch into a safe condition (house disconnected entirely, other than bonding to PEN), and un-powered, or even maybe continue to generate for the house backup circuits, while floating on whatever fault condition PEN/bonding voltage was imposed on it. 

Have I reasoned this out right? 












Parents
  • 0

    Whilst these arrangements are absolutely OK for a switched alternative to the normal supply, and illustrate very well the situation about leaving the distributor's means of earthing connected, I feel it's only fair to readers to point out that they won't support either self-use or export of stored energy in connected mode. Therefore, switching for island mode in a prosumers' electrical installation is a little more tricky, involving switching of an N-E bond. This is because you can't have two N-E bonds at the same time ... and BS 7671 doesn't permit you to rely on the supplier's N-E bond even in PME.



    Definitely agreed - Mike's diagram above is far more comprehensive in this case. I just thought that sometimes it's easier to get a handle on things if you can see a relatively simple example in isolation first - it should then be clearer how Mike's more complicated diagram achieves the same thing in 'off grid' mode.


        - Andy.
Reply
  • 0

    Whilst these arrangements are absolutely OK for a switched alternative to the normal supply, and illustrate very well the situation about leaving the distributor's means of earthing connected, I feel it's only fair to readers to point out that they won't support either self-use or export of stored energy in connected mode. Therefore, switching for island mode in a prosumers' electrical installation is a little more tricky, involving switching of an N-E bond. This is because you can't have two N-E bonds at the same time ... and BS 7671 doesn't permit you to rely on the supplier's N-E bond even in PME.



    Definitely agreed - Mike's diagram above is far more comprehensive in this case. I just thought that sometimes it's easier to get a handle on things if you can see a relatively simple example in isolation first - it should then be clearer how Mike's more complicated diagram achieves the same thing in 'off grid' mode.


        - Andy.
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines