This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Part P - new circuits

Installing a new circuit from the CU is notifiable to the LABC under Part P of the Building Regulations.


Examples include:

1. A circuit for a burglar alarm.

2. A circuit for outside lights.

3. Removing a fixed appliance (such as a heater) from a ring main and providing it with its own dedicated MCB.


However, additions and alterations to existing circuits are not notifiable.


This creates a situation where certain contractors who are not registered electricians are forced to connect any appliances they install to existing circuits rather than providing them with their own dedicated circuits and MCB. Examples include burglar alarm installers wiring alarms to ceiling lights or kitchen fitters wiring heaters to ring mains and cooker switches.


It's probably safe to say that only a small fraction of homeowners are aware that new circuits are notifiable to the LABC under Part P, and a high proportion of them completely ignore the regulations when it comes to their own DIY installations. It's also quite commonplace for cables for new circuits to be installed by builders or labourers, rather than electricians, even if they do not connect them to the appliance or the CU.


Part P regulations have also resulted in a phenomenon of plug-in houses where a large amount of permanent or semi-permanent wiring, including to ceiling lights, is plugged into sockets on a ring main. Anything which is plugged into a socket is outside of the scope of Part P regulations.


My own view of Part P regulations for new circuits, from the perspective of an engineer rather than an electrician, is that methods used by DIY installers or contractors to circumvent having to notify LABC can potentially result in installations that are more dangerous than if they were powered from a new circuit.


Would it make more sense to abolish notification of the LABC for new circuits?
Parents
  • Err, a good friend who is registered with a trade body, doing a favour for some one with significant electrical know-how but who is not registered, and intends to  do his own wiring in slower time and is keen to not do anything that is illegal. Paper work is then fine - "New Consumer unit installed with stub circuits for lights heating and power as per schedule" Notified with list of breakers and test results.

    Paper work for changes to stub circuits will be completed in due course.

    Functional  test is "do the volts reach the JB" It is very quick...

    Not perhaps in the spirit of the rules, but not disobeying the letter.

    (I have found part P can sometimes be more of a hindrance than help to doing a good job...)
Reply
  • Err, a good friend who is registered with a trade body, doing a favour for some one with significant electrical know-how but who is not registered, and intends to  do his own wiring in slower time and is keen to not do anything that is illegal. Paper work is then fine - "New Consumer unit installed with stub circuits for lights heating and power as per schedule" Notified with list of breakers and test results.

    Paper work for changes to stub circuits will be completed in due course.

    Functional  test is "do the volts reach the JB" It is very quick...

    Not perhaps in the spirit of the rules, but not disobeying the letter.

    (I have found part P can sometimes be more of a hindrance than help to doing a good job...)
Children
No Data