The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement
If it did present an earth potential is the easiest way to get this to comply by just linking the earth ring of the gland closest to the unistrut and connecting it to earth that way through the armour of the cable?
Let's look at the facts, rather than making assumptions and firing assertions off in places they don't belong.
A conveyor system is very likely to be "Machinery" as defined. It's probably not even within the scope of BS 7671.
If it is, BS EN 60204-1 applies.
Unlike BS 7671 (or any "guide" book for general electricians using that standard), BS EN 60204-1 has a requirement for the majority of structural parts of the machinery and/or electrical equipment to be bonded (Clause 8.2.1), except in special cases where Clause 8.2.5 applies.
So it might hinge on whether you class the unistrut as a structural element of the machinery or the electrical equipment of the machine.
MrJack96:
It’s industrial I work for a water company. the main conveyor is main bonded back to the starter panel and all the cable tray has been supplementary bonded to the conveyer. There was just the uni strut that wasn’t. But if it was measured as having an earth potential I’d have to run a main bonding conductor back to the panel? I’ve seen it before on sites where the cable tray and uni strut are bonded together and sometimes have been linked to hand railing with an earth strap?
I would have thought that WIMES would cover this. Whilst probably not necessary for the reasons given above, you water chaps do like your bonding so I'd bet someone will pick it up and ask why they can't see a bond.
Regards
OMS
We're making some changes behind the scenes to deliver a better experience for our members and customers. Posting and interactions are paused. Thank you for your patience and see you soon!
For more information, please read this announcement