The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Connecting two earthing systems - PME on both - any implications of this?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Question out of theorotical interest, can you connect the earthing systems of two PME supplies to achieve equipotential bonding between the two electrical supoplies or devices they power?


What are the pro's and con's of this? I understand the implications of PEN faults which might make the earth have touch voltage but if there is equipotential bonding between two earth systems would the earth fault current (earth which now carries live voltage from neutral) not flow through to the earth of the other PME supply?


Appreciate your thoughts.
Parents
  • Well - every one of the guys who have posted on this topic are way more knowledgeable than I so please do take on board what advice has already been given. They are streets ahead of I in knowledge. 


    But I'd put this up for consideration and comment:


    Considering that the metal pipe work, structural steel, gas supply etc etc is probably common to both incoming electrical services it all needs bonding somehow.............


    See Table 54.8 page 203 in the BS7671 - I think that a 100Amp three phase supply would have probably have a copper equivalent cross sectional area of the PEN conductor of less than 35mm - so you'd need to interconnect the two METS with a minimum of 10mm bonding cable..........


    BUT - Like I said - there was a very interesting article - I think it was in wiring  matters that addressed the problem of the length allowed for this bonding cable - I don't know how to post that article here. 


    And I don't like the idea of using the cores of a SWA as a bonding conductor, (I assume you have a spare SWA already in place) I'd rather a dedicated green/yellow earth beteen the two METS - but if it is  labelled correctly and clearly I guess there's nothing prohibiting it's use. 


    Please don't accept my answer on its own, because its the answer you want to hear..........


    Kind Regards

    Tatty
Reply
  • Well - every one of the guys who have posted on this topic are way more knowledgeable than I so please do take on board what advice has already been given. They are streets ahead of I in knowledge. 


    But I'd put this up for consideration and comment:


    Considering that the metal pipe work, structural steel, gas supply etc etc is probably common to both incoming electrical services it all needs bonding somehow.............


    See Table 54.8 page 203 in the BS7671 - I think that a 100Amp three phase supply would have probably have a copper equivalent cross sectional area of the PEN conductor of less than 35mm - so you'd need to interconnect the two METS with a minimum of 10mm bonding cable..........


    BUT - Like I said - there was a very interesting article - I think it was in wiring  matters that addressed the problem of the length allowed for this bonding cable - I don't know how to post that article here. 


    And I don't like the idea of using the cores of a SWA as a bonding conductor, (I assume you have a spare SWA already in place) I'd rather a dedicated green/yellow earth beteen the two METS - but if it is  labelled correctly and clearly I guess there's nothing prohibiting it's use. 


    Please don't accept my answer on its own, because its the answer you want to hear..........


    Kind Regards

    Tatty
Children
No Data