This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Insulation Resistance Measurements

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Hello,


We have a Insulation Resistance measurement unit from Hioki - ST5520.

We are using this to measure multiple devices controlled through a relay matrix as shown in the figure. The positive and negative terminals of the ST5520 is multiplexed through the relay matrix to the 64 pins of the connector. There are 7 pcb's each containing 20 relays.

The individual board testing from ST5520 to the connector is giving a open condition result with a high value of insulation resistance of 9.90Gohm @1000V, when there is no load at the connector output, it is left open.

But the when the whole system is wired and tested with the 7 pcb's(all 32 channels), the value fluctuates and starts with a value from 100Mohm and eventually reaches open condition value.

Is there a problem with this process of multiple channel testing? or this is the expected behaviour? the open condition value(9.90Gohm@1000V) is maintained once it reaches this value and further tests result in this same value. 

Once the system is left OFF for a period of a day, then the testing is resumed again, the same behaviour of starting from 100Mohm to open condition value repeats. Is this to be expected or i am understanding/ doing something wrong?

Any help with this is much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
0d3eb1e11f9f4ba9176cae1b22dc1e68-huge-insulation-measurement.png
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Thanks for the Reply.


    Initially we also assumed that former condition you mentioned and took steps to avoid that, but the result was still the same, so that is ruled out.

    will check and get back after testing the reversal of +ve and -ve leads.

    Lets assume that the large charge up is the problem, is there a way around it? Right now the time it takes for the ramp up is rather large.
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Thanks for the Reply.


    Initially we also assumed that former condition you mentioned and took steps to avoid that, but the result was still the same, so that is ruled out.

    will check and get back after testing the reversal of +ve and -ve leads.

    Lets assume that the large charge up is the problem, is there a way around it? Right now the time it takes for the ramp up is rather large.
Children
No Data