This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Correct Paperwork for Tenanted Property after UKPN call-out for EICR?

Good afternoon, my first post here. I'm a retired SW Engineer originally qualified electrically, but asking this as the owner of a flat I let out, with an ongoing tenancy.

I recently had the flat inspected IAW the new rules for let homes. It has been regularly inspected before and brought up to date as necessary. On the new inspection the - familiar - electrician was happy with all "my" electrics, but marked the EICR Unsatisfactory because the supply head warranted checking, for which he advised me to call UKPN. Fair enough. They came round a day or two later, had a good look, and concluded it was ok. I asked if they issued any paper for that - "no, just logged on our system". But their call handler was happy enough to send me an email detailing the findings & conclusion. Electrician's happy, I'm happy, it's all safe. But the letting agents are whinging that there must be an EIC. Electrician seems quite au fait with new tenancy regs and quotes "Part 2, section 3, paragraph 5, points a-c; a written report by a qualified person" which the email satisfies. And I think I glean that the "Installation" in EIC is my/his bit, whereas UKPN deal with the "supply", so of course they can't do an EIC (and it was only a check - no work done). Yet the agents keep demanding an EIC.

Seems like a sort of bureaucratic mismatch between two organisations? Or are the lettings agent simply getting it wrong in demanding an EIC specifically, not a "written report by a qualified person"?

What do others think should happen next? Or should have happened?
Parents
  • AJJewsbury:
     

    Oh, it's amazing what you can come up with given the right committee...


        - Andy.


    Back in my seagoing times, the "committee" that wrote the spec for MF EPIRB (Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon) a float free device which transmitted a specific signal on 2182 kHz would appear not to have spoken to the "committee" which designed the associated 2182 kHz watch-keeping receiver. This since whilst that receiver could register signals on 2182 kHz from a lifeboat radio, a ship on 2182 kHz or a Coast Radio Station Storm Warning signal on 2182 kHz, would by design ignore that of an EPIRB.....

    Luckily I never needed to rely on one. In fact I never even saw one! Eventually the 2182 kHz EPIRBs were replaced by 121.5 MHz and then 406 MHz versions and I believe by now even more clever devices.

    Clive


Reply
  • AJJewsbury:
     

    Oh, it's amazing what you can come up with given the right committee...


        - Andy.


    Back in my seagoing times, the "committee" that wrote the spec for MF EPIRB (Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon) a float free device which transmitted a specific signal on 2182 kHz would appear not to have spoken to the "committee" which designed the associated 2182 kHz watch-keeping receiver. This since whilst that receiver could register signals on 2182 kHz from a lifeboat radio, a ship on 2182 kHz or a Coast Radio Station Storm Warning signal on 2182 kHz, would by design ignore that of an EPIRB.....

    Luckily I never needed to rely on one. In fact I never even saw one! Eventually the 2182 kHz EPIRBs were replaced by 121.5 MHz and then 406 MHz versions and I believe by now even more clever devices.

    Clive


Children
No Data