This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Correct Paperwork for Tenanted Property after UKPN call-out for EICR?

Good afternoon, my first post here. I'm a retired SW Engineer originally qualified electrically, but asking this as the owner of a flat I let out, with an ongoing tenancy.

I recently had the flat inspected IAW the new rules for let homes. It has been regularly inspected before and brought up to date as necessary. On the new inspection the - familiar - electrician was happy with all "my" electrics, but marked the EICR Unsatisfactory because the supply head warranted checking, for which he advised me to call UKPN. Fair enough. They came round a day or two later, had a good look, and concluded it was ok. I asked if they issued any paper for that - "no, just logged on our system". But their call handler was happy enough to send me an email detailing the findings & conclusion. Electrician's happy, I'm happy, it's all safe. But the letting agents are whinging that there must be an EIC. Electrician seems quite au fait with new tenancy regs and quotes "Part 2, section 3, paragraph 5, points a-c; a written report by a qualified person" which the email satisfies. And I think I glean that the "Installation" in EIC is my/his bit, whereas UKPN deal with the "supply", so of course they can't do an EIC (and it was only a check - no work done). Yet the agents keep demanding an EIC.

Seems like a sort of bureaucratic mismatch between two organisations? Or are the lettings agent simply getting it wrong in demanding an EIC specifically, not a "written report by a qualified person"?

What do others think should happen next? Or should have happened?
Parents
  • On the face of it, an amended EICR is a good solution, but I agree with OlympusMons. It is generally bad practice to amend paperwork without an obvious paper trail. Presumably the electrician recorded FI for the DNO's tackle. Even if the FI had referred to part of the client's installation, there was no requirement for the same electrician to make the further investigations. If the further investigations were satisfactory, how should they be recorded? One could possibly use the model forms, but freehand might be easier. An EICR does not have to be made using the model forms.


    What should happen next? Get a new letting agent!
Reply
  • On the face of it, an amended EICR is a good solution, but I agree with OlympusMons. It is generally bad practice to amend paperwork without an obvious paper trail. Presumably the electrician recorded FI for the DNO's tackle. Even if the FI had referred to part of the client's installation, there was no requirement for the same electrician to make the further investigations. If the further investigations were satisfactory, how should they be recorded? One could possibly use the model forms, but freehand might be easier. An EICR does not have to be made using the model forms.


    What should happen next? Get a new letting agent!
Children
No Data