This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Correct Paperwork for Tenanted Property after UKPN call-out for EICR?

Good afternoon, my first post here. I'm a retired SW Engineer originally qualified electrically, but asking this as the owner of a flat I let out, with an ongoing tenancy.

I recently had the flat inspected IAW the new rules for let homes. It has been regularly inspected before and brought up to date as necessary. On the new inspection the - familiar - electrician was happy with all "my" electrics, but marked the EICR Unsatisfactory because the supply head warranted checking, for which he advised me to call UKPN. Fair enough. They came round a day or two later, had a good look, and concluded it was ok. I asked if they issued any paper for that - "no, just logged on our system". But their call handler was happy enough to send me an email detailing the findings & conclusion. Electrician's happy, I'm happy, it's all safe. But the letting agents are whinging that there must be an EIC. Electrician seems quite au fait with new tenancy regs and quotes "Part 2, section 3, paragraph 5, points a-c; a written report by a qualified person" which the email satisfies. And I think I glean that the "Installation" in EIC is my/his bit, whereas UKPN deal with the "supply", so of course they can't do an EIC (and it was only a check - no work done). Yet the agents keep demanding an EIC.

Seems like a sort of bureaucratic mismatch between two organisations? Or are the lettings agent simply getting it wrong in demanding an EIC specifically, not a "written report by a qualified person"?

What do others think should happen next? Or should have happened?
Parents
  • AJJewsbury:

    I'm still not understanding the reasoning behind such a violent objection to revised documents. .




    I would suggest that it is perfectly in order to revise documents provided that the revisions are signed and dated, etc. in the usual way and that there is a paper trail for the revisions. The difficulty is where one person has made the report and another has remedied the situation.


    Take the situation where Ze is excessive. DNO comes and "PMEs" the supply or whatever. Now what? Do you get your sparks to come back and re-test so that he (or she) may issue a new report; or do you get a certificate from the DNO and staple it to the old report? It gets even trickier where the high Ze has made some of the circuit Zs excessive as well, but who said that life should be easy? 


Reply
  • AJJewsbury:

    I'm still not understanding the reasoning behind such a violent objection to revised documents. .




    I would suggest that it is perfectly in order to revise documents provided that the revisions are signed and dated, etc. in the usual way and that there is a paper trail for the revisions. The difficulty is where one person has made the report and another has remedied the situation.


    Take the situation where Ze is excessive. DNO comes and "PMEs" the supply or whatever. Now what? Do you get your sparks to come back and re-test so that he (or she) may issue a new report; or do you get a certificate from the DNO and staple it to the old report? It gets even trickier where the high Ze has made some of the circuit Zs excessive as well, but who said that life should be easy? 


Children
No Data