This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Correct Paperwork for Tenanted Property after UKPN call-out for EICR?

Good afternoon, my first post here. I'm a retired SW Engineer originally qualified electrically, but asking this as the owner of a flat I let out, with an ongoing tenancy.

I recently had the flat inspected IAW the new rules for let homes. It has been regularly inspected before and brought up to date as necessary. On the new inspection the - familiar - electrician was happy with all "my" electrics, but marked the EICR Unsatisfactory because the supply head warranted checking, for which he advised me to call UKPN. Fair enough. They came round a day or two later, had a good look, and concluded it was ok. I asked if they issued any paper for that - "no, just logged on our system". But their call handler was happy enough to send me an email detailing the findings & conclusion. Electrician's happy, I'm happy, it's all safe. But the letting agents are whinging that there must be an EIC. Electrician seems quite au fait with new tenancy regs and quotes "Part 2, section 3, paragraph 5, points a-c; a written report by a qualified person" which the email satisfies. And I think I glean that the "Installation" in EIC is my/his bit, whereas UKPN deal with the "supply", so of course they can't do an EIC (and it was only a check - no work done). Yet the agents keep demanding an EIC.

Seems like a sort of bureaucratic mismatch between two organisations? Or are the lettings agent simply getting it wrong in demanding an EIC specifically, not a "written report by a qualified person"?

What do others think should happen next? Or should have happened?
Parents
  • "The only way I can see to square that is for the DNO/supplier part of the EICR checklist be treated as 'for comment/information only' and not attract codes or contribute to the overall EICR satisfactory/unsatisfactory status. Common sense notwithstanding."


    Absolutely agree, what authority does BS 7671 have to make a judgement on the work of ESCR 2001?

    It appears that the DNO's are having a good laugh knowing that their work is being done without any aurthorisation by a non-statutary body who will take the blame unknowingly for the DNO's negligence.

    Time to take up golf one thinks....

    Legh
Reply
  • "The only way I can see to square that is for the DNO/supplier part of the EICR checklist be treated as 'for comment/information only' and not attract codes or contribute to the overall EICR satisfactory/unsatisfactory status. Common sense notwithstanding."


    Absolutely agree, what authority does BS 7671 have to make a judgement on the work of ESCR 2001?

    It appears that the DNO's are having a good laugh knowing that their work is being done without any aurthorisation by a non-statutary body who will take the blame unknowingly for the DNO's negligence.

    Time to take up golf one thinks....

    Legh
Children
No Data