Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 36 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 3109 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Last few days/hours to comment on Amendment 2, BS7671 before the shutters close

mapj1
Just a reminder the deadline for comments on the latest draft for  comment is fast approaching - this Friday the 11th in fact. (Though it is not clear if that is midday or midnight, so probably best to log in and out again before the end of Thursday..)


If you wish to comment and have not yet done so you need to create an account on the BSI website

Click on login/register on the RHS of the BSI welcome page  and  give them an email you can read without needing to change machine, as you need to click a verify link they send you.

Once logged in  search for "BS 7671:2018" oddly searching for BS 7671 without the space between BS and 7671:2018 does not find it...

There are 4 links as the thing is a bit of a monster. PDFs of each part can be downloaded for perusal, but to finally comment you need the on-screen viewer (the Read Draft and comment button)

This is not quick so allow plenty of time.



regards Mike
Parents
  • 0
    AJJewsbury:
    AFDD is intended to improve safety, but without it, we still have two faults required to danger

    Two faults to danger from electric shock, but perhaps not two faults to danger from fire?


    Which is why I would be more inclined to code absence of AFDD than absence of SPD.


    Now then, which is a better means of detecting a dangerous arc fault - inspection or AFDD?


Reply
  • 0
    AJJewsbury:
    AFDD is intended to improve safety, but without it, we still have two faults required to danger

    Two faults to danger from electric shock, but perhaps not two faults to danger from fire?


    Which is why I would be more inclined to code absence of AFDD than absence of SPD.


    Now then, which is a better means of detecting a dangerous arc fault - inspection or AFDD?


Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines