I suspect we can, though it is not not quite a simple current scaling.
Let us see what the curves are telling us.
Firstly important to note that the inrush problem is more serious when large numbers of small lamps are switched together compared to a few big ones.
( so 300W of 10W fittings may be the same inrush as more like 1kW of 75 watt ones - looking at the C10)
Comparing 10A and 16A curves they give,and looking at the ends of the curves, we see
15 *10W and 4*75W for the B10 and
These become
22* 10W and 8* 75W for the B16
30*10W and 5*150W for the C10
These become 22* 10W and 8* 150W for the C16
not quite 1.6 to one from 10A to 16 however - 15/22 is more like 1.4
So I'd expect the 6A C type numbers to be more like 0.4 of the 10A ones, not 0.6 as you may expect
I'd also expect a 6A B type to be troublesome with more than about 50W of low wattage LED loads ,. and therefore not recommended for very much beyond the smallest set-up.
I suspect we can, though it is not not quite a simple current scaling.
Let us see what the curves are telling us.
Firstly important to note that the inrush problem is more serious when large numbers of small lamps are switched together compared to a few big ones.
( so 300W of 10W fittings may be the same inrush as more like 1kW of 75 watt ones - looking at the C10)
Comparing 10A and 16A curves they give,and looking at the ends of the curves, we see
15 *10W and 4*75W for the B10 and
These become
22* 10W and 8* 75W for the B16
30*10W and 5*150W for the C10
These become 22* 10W and 8* 150W for the C16
not quite 1.6 to one from 10A to 16 however - 15/22 is more like 1.4
So I'd expect the 6A C type numbers to be more like 0.4 of the 10A ones, not 0.6 as you may expect
I'd also expect a 6A B type to be troublesome with more than about 50W of low wattage LED loads ,. and therefore not recommended for very much beyond the smallest set-up.