This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

High protective conductor currents radial circuit.

Various guidance shows running an additional cpc as a ring. What are the implications of running two cpc’s, but terminate them as the radial, each cpc being terminated in a separate terminal within a twin earth accessory. Each circuit cpc then terminated separately back at the DB. This would do away with usual steal link on the accessory. Amount of terminations would be the same.
Parents
  • wessex:

    I can see having two cpc's per earth terminal could produce a weakness/reliability issue.


    Agreed, if it were required by BS7671 to have a continuous earthing (and possibly live) conductor in radial circuits it would mitigate a failed termination causing loss of earthing in another accessory. The conductor is bent and looped into the terminal, thus maintaining continuity. It is a trickier wiring job, looping cables into accessory boxes without cutting the cable, leaving enough slack, but not too much. Note that this would not be allowed by 543.7.1.204 if there was a ring, since each end needs to be terminated in separate terminals, but would be allowed by it if there was a parallel "ladder" arrangement with two CPCs
    2d31e3436a04aadf00703238516e3252-original-cpcs.png


Reply
  • wessex:

    I can see having two cpc's per earth terminal could produce a weakness/reliability issue.


    Agreed, if it were required by BS7671 to have a continuous earthing (and possibly live) conductor in radial circuits it would mitigate a failed termination causing loss of earthing in another accessory. The conductor is bent and looped into the terminal, thus maintaining continuity. It is a trickier wiring job, looping cables into accessory boxes without cutting the cable, leaving enough slack, but not too much. Note that this would not be allowed by 543.7.1.204 if there was a ring, since each end needs to be terminated in separate terminals, but would be allowed by it if there was a parallel "ladder" arrangement with two CPCs
    2d31e3436a04aadf00703238516e3252-original-cpcs.png


Children
No Data