This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Light reading

057333447b9d9089180dba9bdabb529b-huge-fc891021-69a1-4a15-a935-213b1a21c0d8.jpgJust doing a bit of light reading can someone explain this to me please.
Parents
  • First question


    Ohm's Law and the "voltage divider rule" tell us that the larger the resistance to earth, the greater the touch voltage.

    Since fatal shock current is measured at the most in 10s of mA, and load resistances are very low, even with very large earth electrode resistances in the extraneous-conductive-parts, is it now possible to see how someone can receive a fatal shock from this?

    Second question


    50 V AC is generally taken in BS 7671 to be a relatively safe touch voltage (some "zones" in special locations in Part 7 are obvious exceptions to that rule).

    100 V is used by DNOs as their "safe" limit.


    Section 722 uses 70 V for particular reasons (both hands-to-feet shock risk, large contact area, water-wet conditions, persons clothed and wearing shoes).
Reply
  • First question


    Ohm's Law and the "voltage divider rule" tell us that the larger the resistance to earth, the greater the touch voltage.

    Since fatal shock current is measured at the most in 10s of mA, and load resistances are very low, even with very large earth electrode resistances in the extraneous-conductive-parts, is it now possible to see how someone can receive a fatal shock from this?

    Second question


    50 V AC is generally taken in BS 7671 to be a relatively safe touch voltage (some "zones" in special locations in Part 7 are obvious exceptions to that rule).

    100 V is used by DNOs as their "safe" limit.


    Section 722 uses 70 V for particular reasons (both hands-to-feet shock risk, large contact area, water-wet conditions, persons clothed and wearing shoes).
Children
No Data