Legh Richardson:ebee:
I didn`t realise that the 2391 was still running.
I thought that it was split into two easier parts with another name.
Lyle, have you considered making your own you tube course - a bit in the way of those John Ward videos ? Just a thought2391 has been resurrected. I suspect that 2394 and 2395 were too complicated to administer.
Too bloody complicated to sit. C&G used to publish a wee book entitled, "Exam success. Inspection and testing 2394 and 2395." I had one of the last copies! Problem was that it didn't exactly prepare one for the practical.
I suspect that part of the rationale for 2391 was to remove the duplication. The practical test was very similar for both except that in 2395 a couple of anomalies were added.
Legh Richardson:ebee:
I didn`t realise that the 2391 was still running.
I thought that it was split into two easier parts with another name.
Lyle, have you considered making your own you tube course - a bit in the way of those John Ward videos ? Just a thought2391 has been resurrected. I suspect that 2394 and 2395 were too complicated to administer.
Too bloody complicated to sit. C&G used to publish a wee book entitled, "Exam success. Inspection and testing 2394 and 2395." I had one of the last copies! Problem was that it didn't exactly prepare one for the practical.
I suspect that part of the rationale for 2391 was to remove the duplication. The practical test was very similar for both except that in 2395 a couple of anomalies were added.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site