This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Physics going on in a transformer

Former Community Member
Former Community Member

I’m trying to get a better understanding of the physics going on in a UK site transformer, those that reduce the UK mains voltage to 110V.



I’m fully aware of the basic operating principles of a transformer and the basic Power in equals V*I . Power out is the same as power in and induced voltage is given by Faradays law dependent upon the number of turns, and changing magnetic flux with time. With these we can work back from a load to determine the current draw from the secondary side of a transformer.



What I would like clarified is, depending upon the varying load on the secondary side, what at different loads is happening to the magnetic field strength in the core and the power in the primary side.



For example when I have a 1800W tool connected to my 3.3Kva 110V transformer and the power is on in the primary side but the load tool is not switched on. Obviously there is current flowing in the primary coil since there are no switches on these transformers apart from the socket switch. This will create a magnetic field which will induce an emf on the secondary windings.



If there is no load on the secondary side, is the magnetic field strength in the core and the power in the primary at its maximum even with no load on the secondary?



Or is primary input current much lower in comparison to what it could be if the transformer secondary is loaded to its maximum current output? Does putting a load on the secondary cause a feedback through the magnetic field resulting in the current increasing in the primary, hence increasing the magnetic field?



Thanks


Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    So I read your responses which left me thinking further about the original question.


    Would I be correct in stating the following and if so please feel free to expand in greater detail, or correct, though having read Mikes last post I think you may have already beaten me to the punch.



    With no load on the secondary there is a 'magnetising current in the primary the size of which depends upon the design and build quality of the transformer. This primary current creates the magnetic field around the core, alternating back and forth. 


    The strength of the magnetic field is given by the equation, B = u*n*l (permeability * number of turns * current) 


    The energy in the magnetic field is 


    2af12182fd7c13795f11fb157f016624-original-image.png

    Therefore the amount of energy in the magnetic field is dependent upon the size of the primary current. Power is the rate of energy conversion which for the primary will be electric to magnetic energy at voltage * current. There will be a loss of energy due to Lenz's law across the primary coil.


    The magnetic field induces an emf on the secondary coil. This when loaded will draw a current. This current too will as a result of Lenz's law result in a further partial loss of energy from the magnetic field.


    This induced magnetic field as a result of the current on the secondary actually counteracts the total size of the magnetic field from the primary, and therefore the energy in it.


    If you could take an instant snap shot in time and at the same time not cause a change in the primary current this reduction in the size of the magnetic field from the primary means the amount of energy in the magnetic field available has to decrease too. The rate of this reduction has to be matched by the rate of energy withdrawal from the magnetic field at the secondary side which explains why with voltage fixed the current has to increase in a step down transformer. 


    In reality until the transformer is fully loaded to its maximum Kva rating the current in the primary will increase putting energy back into the magnetic field to maintain the energy levels which with its maximum available size per given current has to have a matching energy withdrawal at the secondary side. 


    ​​​​​​​Neil


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    So I read your responses which left me thinking further about the original question.


    Would I be correct in stating the following and if so please feel free to expand in greater detail, or correct, though having read Mikes last post I think you may have already beaten me to the punch.



    With no load on the secondary there is a 'magnetising current in the primary the size of which depends upon the design and build quality of the transformer. This primary current creates the magnetic field around the core, alternating back and forth. 


    The strength of the magnetic field is given by the equation, B = u*n*l (permeability * number of turns * current) 


    The energy in the magnetic field is 


    2af12182fd7c13795f11fb157f016624-original-image.png

    Therefore the amount of energy in the magnetic field is dependent upon the size of the primary current. Power is the rate of energy conversion which for the primary will be electric to magnetic energy at voltage * current. There will be a loss of energy due to Lenz's law across the primary coil.


    The magnetic field induces an emf on the secondary coil. This when loaded will draw a current. This current too will as a result of Lenz's law result in a further partial loss of energy from the magnetic field.


    This induced magnetic field as a result of the current on the secondary actually counteracts the total size of the magnetic field from the primary, and therefore the energy in it.


    If you could take an instant snap shot in time and at the same time not cause a change in the primary current this reduction in the size of the magnetic field from the primary means the amount of energy in the magnetic field available has to decrease too. The rate of this reduction has to be matched by the rate of energy withdrawal from the magnetic field at the secondary side which explains why with voltage fixed the current has to increase in a step down transformer. 


    In reality until the transformer is fully loaded to its maximum Kva rating the current in the primary will increase putting energy back into the magnetic field to maintain the energy levels which with its maximum available size per given current has to have a matching energy withdrawal at the secondary side. 


    ​​​​​​​Neil


Children
No Data