This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Physics going on in a transformer

Former Community Member
Former Community Member

I’m trying to get a better understanding of the physics going on in a UK site transformer, those that reduce the UK mains voltage to 110V.



I’m fully aware of the basic operating principles of a transformer and the basic Power in equals V*I . Power out is the same as power in and induced voltage is given by Faradays law dependent upon the number of turns, and changing magnetic flux with time. With these we can work back from a load to determine the current draw from the secondary side of a transformer.



What I would like clarified is, depending upon the varying load on the secondary side, what at different loads is happening to the magnetic field strength in the core and the power in the primary side.



For example when I have a 1800W tool connected to my 3.3Kva 110V transformer and the power is on in the primary side but the load tool is not switched on. Obviously there is current flowing in the primary coil since there are no switches on these transformers apart from the socket switch. This will create a magnetic field which will induce an emf on the secondary windings.



If there is no load on the secondary side, is the magnetic field strength in the core and the power in the primary at its maximum even with no load on the secondary?



Or is primary input current much lower in comparison to what it could be if the transformer secondary is loaded to its maximum current output? Does putting a load on the secondary cause a feedback through the magnetic field resulting in the current increasing in the primary, hence increasing the magnetic field?



Thanks


Parents
  • Indeed- magnetics is badly explained in many books, and so it is often badly taught as well. And then folk confuse eddy currents from flux lines, and resistive heating with magnetic losses, when really they are orthogonal.


    The B field in the core is a bit like the voltage on the mains - more or less the same amplitude independent of load. The current drawn from the supply at that constant voltage needed to generate that B field however, does depend directly on the amount of current in the secondary.

    M.
Reply
  • Indeed- magnetics is badly explained in many books, and so it is often badly taught as well. And then folk confuse eddy currents from flux lines, and resistive heating with magnetic losses, when really they are orthogonal.


    The B field in the core is a bit like the voltage on the mains - more or less the same amplitude independent of load. The current drawn from the supply at that constant voltage needed to generate that B field however, does depend directly on the amount of current in the secondary.

    M.
Children
No Data