This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

OSG Standard Circuits - 3A lighting

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
As we are all using led lamps / fittings now it seems this should be a standard circuit.

3A MCB with 1.0/1.0 cable


Lighting circuits used to be based on 100w incandescent lamp / room at 1800 lumens which is equiv to 20w led.

What are the figures for max distance for a 3A type B using 1.0/1.0 as an addition in table 7.1 page 66 in OSG?
Parents
  • What advantage would there be of using a 3A MCB? I can see none at all, and just a pile of possible snags. Close fusing may be used in certain other situations, but why on a simple lighting circuit? Just who floated the idea, because it needs a proper explanation? Perhaps it's the latest EU idea to save energy, turn on 3 lights and the whole lot go out. Even less sensible than a 500W kettle! Whilst a 3A type C might work Mike, please explain the advantage and the price differential? But then they might get cheaper in the future, like AFDDs. Ah I know, a 3A AFDD/MCB/RCD combination will mean the AFDD doesn't have to work at all, pretty much as they don't if the arc is low current < 3A! Still in the regs though.
Reply
  • What advantage would there be of using a 3A MCB? I can see none at all, and just a pile of possible snags. Close fusing may be used in certain other situations, but why on a simple lighting circuit? Just who floated the idea, because it needs a proper explanation? Perhaps it's the latest EU idea to save energy, turn on 3 lights and the whole lot go out. Even less sensible than a 500W kettle! Whilst a 3A type C might work Mike, please explain the advantage and the price differential? But then they might get cheaper in the future, like AFDDs. Ah I know, a 3A AFDD/MCB/RCD combination will mean the AFDD doesn't have to work at all, pretty much as they don't if the arc is low current < 3A! Still in the regs though.
Children
No Data