The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement
AJJewsbury:
Curiously 511.1 seems to be a little at odds with 133.1 - the latter seems to accept an 'an apprioriate standard of another country' without any special declarations.
- Andy.
That's not quite what it says, Andy.
An appropriate standard of another country is only accepted in the absence of an appropriate British or Harmonized Standard ... otherwise, in the absence of all standards, 133.1.2 is invoked.
133.1.2 requires some form of agreement ... and of course 511.1 covers that.
However, in this particular case, we are discussing something "not in accordance with 133.1.1" (as there is an appropriate British Standard for a standard socket-outlet) and therefore 133.1.3 applies, which actually requires the use to be recorded exactly as 511.1 says.
So, overall, I don't quite see the conflict in this case.
AJJewsbury:
Curiously 511.1 seems to be a little at odds with 133.1 - the latter seems to accept an 'an apprioriate standard of another country' without any special declarations.
- Andy.
That's not quite what it says, Andy.
An appropriate standard of another country is only accepted in the absence of an appropriate British or Harmonized Standard ... otherwise, in the absence of all standards, 133.1.2 is invoked.
133.1.2 requires some form of agreement ... and of course 511.1 covers that.
However, in this particular case, we are discussing something "not in accordance with 133.1.1" (as there is an appropriate British Standard for a standard socket-outlet) and therefore 133.1.3 applies, which actually requires the use to be recorded exactly as 511.1 says.
So, overall, I don't quite see the conflict in this case.
We're making some changes behind the scenes to deliver a better experience for our members and customers. Posting and interactions are paused. Thank you for your patience and see you soon!
For more information, please read this announcement