The FIT was intended to encourage adoption of PV when at the time it wasn't economically viable - the assumption being that by increasing demand, it would eventually bring down costs (which has in fact happened on a global scale, perhaps partially as a result of FIT-like schemes by governments). Does it matter whether the solar panels were bought by home owners, or effectively borrowed, on increasing the PV capacity?
The FIT was intended to encourage adoption of PV when at the time it wasn't economically viable - the assumption being that by increasing demand, it would eventually bring down costs (which has in fact happened on a global scale, perhaps partially as a result of FIT-like schemes by governments). Does it matter whether the solar panels were bought by home owners, or effectively borrowed, on increasing the PV capacity?
