Hm Chris, Why is no having RCD protection in an office environment potentially dangerous? Lack of Earthing might be, damaged cables might be, but as the accident rate in this environment from electric shock is essentially zero unless someone does something deliberate, is C2 reasonable? I doubt it. This would be quite a hard one to argue, as there is probably no statistical difference between offices with RCDs and without. We do need a degree of reasonableness about regs changes, I wonder what other problems were identified? I would code it C3, but then I would not get any reparations work. The trouble is that there is little comeback for this kind of thing.
Hm Chris, Why is no having RCD protection in an office environment potentially dangerous? Lack of Earthing might be, damaged cables might be, but as the accident rate in this environment from electric shock is essentially zero unless someone does something deliberate, is C2 reasonable? I doubt it. This would be quite a hard one to argue, as there is probably no statistical difference between offices with RCDs and without. We do need a degree of reasonableness about regs changes, I wonder what other problems were identified? I would code it C3, but then I would not get any reparations work. The trouble is that there is little comeback for this kind of thing.
